Python uses it in the last couple of versions.
1,777 karma · joined November 21, 2008
This account is inactive and abandoned, and is under the control of HN admins.
Python uses it in the last couple of versions.
Is writing less than 20MB/sec of data something to brag about?
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights for example does not say "it only applies to when a government are restricting those rights".
Article 19
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
I'm genuinely interested if you could link to something describing what you are talking about.
The HN system which allowed people to downvote you is limiting your speech. Facebook removing posts about sex is limiting your free speech.
I find it really perverse that people are ok with banning people talking about sex, but are fine with them calling for murder.
Take a guess which society has tens of thousands of murders, and millions in prison? The one that takes away free speech about sex, but protects people calling to kill immigrants.
"Are my posts, which openly express my dislike of elves, hate speech?"
No, because that's really silly. The law would let you do that.
If instead you asked people to kill people, that would be taken down.
People can still say they don't want immigrants.
What they can't do is ask people to burn down houses where they live or do 'vigilante justice' on them. These are actual things that people have asked others to do, and actually done.
Facebook previously limited speech for things like sex, but was ok with keeping up criminal posts calling for murder.
Facebook previously would allow hate speech(like calling for violence), but take down comments by people talking about sex.
The "Growth mindset!" safe word part at the end was quite apt.
However, it's possible to get a LOT done when you're not growing. For example in basketball, if you know how to do a play which beats other teams all the time, then running that play can be a great idea. Of course, perhaps another team finally figures out your plays and they become useless. Then you might wish you'd spent some of that time growing and developing more plays.
Like how Gates is successful, and is able to spend more of his time growing and trying different things. Because he doesn't need to spend a lot of his time executing successful plays so he can pay rent.
Alpha, is what the Article says. Which means not ready, and changing in development quite a lot.
There's always a new technique to master which can be brought upon in your work.
It is novel once you get there, but may take a while.
Quality construction, impeccable tailoring, expert craftsmanship – these are the marks of quality.
There's novelty in the next feature around the corner, but there is beauty in something crafted.
Ecstatic pleasure can be obtained from crafting. Perhaps give it a go.
Why wouldn't these components be written to specification?
"We stress that this is a theoretical attack on the definition of security and we do not see any way of turning the attack into a full plaintext-recovery attack."
... which appears wrong, and even published after the other paper?
I imagine this will still be useful though.
Do they have a moral or ethical obligation to support the society that gave them life?
Should the Australian government have supported them more than say the coal or car industry? Hell yes. This is a massive blunder on the part of the Australian government. One that has been repeated for decades.
Could Australia be in the position to provide as much capital as Atlassian is raising now? Yes! There is a LOT of money flowing around Australia. Just a small percentage of Super (compulsory pension funds) could have been invested. Even R&D tax breaks could have given more. However, VC invested by Australian funds is tiny (less than 1 billion/year).
The fact is Atlassian left Australia to avoid paying tax. They have even admitted it many times. The Australian government should have done more to keep them there. Maybe Atlassian leaving will actually do more good in the long term, because more people will see the missed opportunities. (not holding my breath on that one).
Shine a light in their eyes, and yes they react. As does everything else with eyes.
"Privacy: a secret matter."
"Privacy: freedom from unauthorized intrusion."
"Privacy: the quality or state of being apart from company or observation."
So you see, privacy IS security.
A parallel CRC32 can be slightly faster with more data segment used, and more code size.
Also PCLMULQDQ can use an polynomial I think. So they could make a compatible version.
The lookup table version they used has to have used lots more CPU cache. Also, I would suggest they look at reducing the amount of times they call the function. Since there are two ways to speed up functions that are called a lot. One is to stop calling it so many times.
Or since IO is limiting, they could consider compressing/decompressing the data as well. Using something fast like LZ4 compression. This will give them faster IO and a checksum at the same time. Something like Blosc can be faster than memcpy. Especially since the data is replicated over the network as well, and they would save space on their storage.
Modern CPU performance optimization is very often about memory IO. If the data is in L2/L3 then you can do a LOT of computation on it, almost for free, compared to the time it takes to get it into L2/L3.
During that time waiting for memory/disk/network IO, they might consider other things. Like indexing, better checksums (like SHA1) or even encryption. Especially if the data is already in L2/L3.
I wonder if this is what caused the error in the article?
Where they use 0.6 grams in one place, and 1 gram in another place. That's quite a difference.
I wonder how much exercise which works on internal organs would help compared to drastic weight loss? For example, yoga. Of course weight loss has lots of other benefits, but I'd guess doing exercise which concentrates on internal organs might help sooner. This might help skinny-fat people too, who have internal fat but not that much weight.