In fact, this change seems quite logical. AI is certainly a useful tool, but that doesn't mean it must be uded always and everythere. Edpecially when doing so could compromise the final quality of projects. Let's see where all this leads
How do they check taht they got the meaning right? Getting a whale to react is cool, but that's a pretty big jump to knowing what it's actually saying.
I have to agree. This is especially noticeable in software; it’s impossible to distinguish manual work from the generated kind. There’s no point in appealing to the human element here, the buyer simply doesn’t see the difference. But fortunately, for now, we still have work.
I like that Pi is holding the line on minimalism instead of absorbing every new trend. Curious how Pi Durable differs from existing durable-execution setups for agents
It is regrettable that the law draws no distinction between such a situation and the sale of counterfeit goods on eBay. Section 1201 does not take intent into account, whereas the aforementioned "pirate code" essentially consists of norms developed by the community itself.
It doesn't look like a coincidence; it looks more like a request someone made. Essentially, the agents used a brute-force approach, but then again, it actually worked. I’m not even sure what to make of it all.
Yeah, I agree that with the right expertise you can keep WordPress safe, and the White House is a good example of that. But the problem is the WP ecosystem and defaults push people without that expertise to install plugins and themes, and "if you know what you're doing" is the exception, not the rule for its user base
The notable thing is that Luna regressed a bit on coding while dropping 60% in price.That's a fair trade, for high-volume work Luna at that price is basically free, but it does show that newer doesn't always mean better.
The architecture without inhibit lines is interesting. Did this make the memory faster, or was the main goal simply to reduce the number of sense amplifiers and simplify the board layout?
Sometimes I think I'm too detail-oriented. Then I remember that someone once spent weeks manually rewording a game FAQ so the right margin would look pretty in a text file. And I feel better about myself...
It's wild that a tradition like this has stuck around for nearly 600 years and turned into such a valuable climate record. 25 no-cross winters in the last 34 years compared to just 5 in the 50 years before 1950 is pretty much a straight up graph of global warming...
Interesting find. Overall it makes sense from a deepfake-fighting perspective and EU requirements. But what's concerning is that users aren't really told about this, as far as I can tell. Would be cool if someone checked if it can be bypassed, like swapping the DLL or intercepting the API call. But yeah, it's another step toward every digital trace becoming personally identifiable...
The article is solid. But there is a nuance what he skipped — quality vs price. Sure, GPT-5.6 Luna for pennies can do the same thing what Claude 4.5 Sonnet did for a dollar a year ago. Except Sonnet back then actually carried the codebase, while Luna... eh, not so much.
And another thing, speed. You can make it cheaper as much as you want, but if a model thinks for half a minute you save cents but lose time.
I have mixed feelings. It seems like nothing serious happened, no one was hurt, and all the systems worked, but on the other hand, this is still an emergency. Why did those rods fall in the first place?