1. limited to those that choose to tweet, and therefore 2. limited to the projection of personality onto a social media platform (which does not need to be genuine)
308 karma · joined September 18, 2022
1. limited to those that choose to tweet, and therefore 2. limited to the projection of personality onto a social media platform (which does not need to be genuine)
One thing that struck me as to the difficulty / young-ness of this field is also the fact that it is the only science that is us studying our thinking selves. It's almost like trying to draw a picture of the exact spot you are standing on.
Does the platform also help speed up the labelling of semi-structured data? I have a use case where I need to take data in word, ppt, pdf; label paragraphs / sections which could then be used to fine tune a model
On nut allergies, we have a tradition in India where pregnant and breast feeding women are given every single type of nut over a period of time in a particular sequence. There is something called panjiri that is an amalgam of nuts and ghee, the idea being to provide sustenance to a pregnant mother and then after birth slowly introducing different nuts (and other foods) into the diet over a period of days/weeks. This stuff has been honed over a period of generations.
Nut allergies are fairly uncommon in India. This isn't some silver bullet thing, but just another piece of evidence not to just listen to medical professionals blindly.
Off days are tough. The important thing is not to feel guilty about it.
What is that? a degree? job? title? is there only 1 type of person who becomes an engineer? and if it can't be a degree because there are 5 million different types of 'engineers' and it is definitely not a homogeneous group.
"For Study 1: Adult Perceivers, a power analysis based on previous effects (5) indicated a desired sample size of 120 participants. We had 117 students (62% women, age range: 18 to 30 y, M 24.7, SD 2.1; participants were recruited by the online university panel...All had a similar demographic background...We discarded two data points (out of 1,872)"
1. Re-iterate your points, counter points, data, etc. 2. Acknowledge their point, assume it to be true and ask questions to clarify their point by digging further into the details
In my exp, method 1 generally does not lead to much. Method 2 will either give YOU a new perspective on things OR the other person will back off once they hit rock bottom and think twice before bringing up nonsensical points with you.
It is MUCH MUCH harder going down path 2 as it requires you to put YOUR point/perspective aside for a while and empathize with their view. But being able to cross-question people like this is an incredibly useful skill worth developing.
As an introvert, you are inherently more curious. Use that to your advantage.
Scrum can be useful as a way to get a team (and its leaders) going, build habits around releasing small batches/iterations of value but it is not particularly scale-able and puts a ceiling on the performance of a team. For leadership its a good way to get them to start loosening the reigns by having the right conversations.
The board part of Kanban is just one basic component. What gets skipped over are the EXPLICIT POLICIES that are refined over time i.e. what constitutes being in a column; the measurement of throughput (which is covered in the article); and a very high focus on continuous improvement (which includes the columns AND rows of the board, associated policies, and WIP limits)
Scrum gets a lot of hate because it's been commercialized and bastardized by people half-assedly doing it. It has a time and place. If you use a saw as a hammer you're not gonna have a good time.
Pomodoro has been another thing that works well for me to split up my time/keep getting things done while making sure I'm taking frequent breaks.
Simple, effective.
But given their lack of thermal regulation, I wonder if this leaves them especially vulnerable to climate change.
Is the intent to have multiple tribler-like instances serving different (content) domains or more of a one-spot search that content providers can serve their content through? I ask as I'm wondering about how you foresee this "degrading" as it scales as that is where most current content platforms fail apart as they try to grow/maximize audience.