indubitably

Better go back to print, then.

var sample = [['50f7w4r3', 'software'], ['3n61n33r5', 'engineers'], ['h4v3', 'have']];

var mapping = sample.reduce((mapping, word) => { var leet = word[0], en = word[1]; var letters = leet.split(''); letters.forEach((letter, i) => { mapping[letter] = en[i]; }); return mapping }, {} )

var divs = [].slice.call(document.body.querySelectorAll('div'));

divs.forEach(div => { div.addEventListener('click', function(ev){ ev.stopPropagation(); div.textContent = div.textContent.split('').map(c => { var result = ''; if (c in mapping) { return mapping[c] } else { return c } }) .join('') }) })

There is no general answer to this question.

I hope not, Javascript is awesome.

It's trying to load a public.html that isn't there?

I'd rather know which company is _least_ like grad school, because this.

aaaaaaand no one cares.

Does `setTimeout` have a default value for the time?

leave early

This. A lot of the frameworks are doing things that can sort of be done with vanilla JS now — personally I’m waiting on Object.observe to become more widespread.

Gotta be honest my doubts are raised by the HTML4.0 doctype in the sample document.

Except that file is 10x bigger than loki…

The most important thing about HTML5 is <video>? What a weird statement.

We should be writing papers in HTML.

This particular text is already widely available. (There are scans of the whole thing on Wikipedia, for instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Borgia#mediaviewer/File:C... .

Because “everyone” means people who don’t necessarily follow browser development trends.

But the suggestion is to carry out a simple hash on the input phrase — one could use the second or third letter, for instance. (Or the first, second, third, first, second, third…)

How could a dictionary-style attack predict all possible such arrangments?

Testing a statistical language identifier with texts this short is absurd. If you type in four or five words from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Frenc...

…do you expect it to return French or English?

This sounds tremendous. It would be great for educational contexts — a development environment that doesn’t require anything more than installing a browser…

Why?

Whatever. Normal people do their own laundry, like they brush their own teeth.

People that work at Google live in apartments that have laundry onsite.

Because when they saw to it that the people who previously lived in that apartment were pushed out by rent increases, they also demanded that the landlord put in laundry machines.

That way, they could do their laundry at work and have the satisfaction of checking off "on-site laundry" in their mental status meters.

"on-site laundry machines"

Let's just pause and think about how INSANE that is. Are people that work at Google really so hopelessly dependent on their employer that they can't handle basic bodily sanitation without help?

Let me get this straight. These people are taking their laundry on the Google bus to wash their clothes at work?

Hi, reality much?

You're equating syntactic abstractions one-to-one with pieces of plastic.

What?

R sucks

and by everyone they mean anyone who has bought their phone

50 courses?

Disgusting.

The starkness with which he divides geeks from non-geeks makes me a little sad. People can learn to reason at multiple levels of abstraction.

This is awesome.