I think they meant in the sense of it being worn away and destroyed as an intended use.
Adjective definition 3 from https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ablative
72 karma · joined January 10, 2016
Adjective definition 3 from https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ablative
Slightly OT but Doppler is quite good in my opinion.
Possibly more of a subtle miscommunication or misunderstanding than a deliberate lie.
This is bonkers to me considering how it’s used in industry.
But this is a side channel attack, right?
In that that time:
* I have not had to worry that I’ll inadvertently trigger an account ban and lose my email account/all my email with no recourse.
* UI updates have been gradual, subdued and useful.
* Support requests have been answered promptly and have been extremely helpful, including one case where the web UI wasn’t loading through the corporate proxy, we determined it was the proxy (not their service) and an engineer STILL helped me with a fix after the ticket was closed.
* No significant (if any) price changes.
* No significant outages (that I can remember).
I’m still annoyed about that.
FYI: The year part of a CVE ID is either when the ID was assigned or when the issue was publicised: https://cve.mitre.org/about/faqs.html#year_portion_of_cve_id
Not (as I had assumed) when the vulnerable software was first published.
But you could say the same thing of browsers.
The whole raison d'être of Brave is to restore privacy to consumers of advertisements while being fair to publishers.
The codebase is all MPL2 on Github. Nothing stopping you or anyone forking it, yada yada.