HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

isworenot2

0 karma · joined October 17, 2022

submissionscomments
isworenot2··on GitHub Copilot, with “public code” blocked, emits my copyrighted code
Industry always saw open source as a cost cutting measure.

I think the real lesson to learn is if you look at the sheer amount of energy (wattage) used to replace humans it's clear that brains are really calorie efficient at doing things like producing the kinds of code that Copilot creates...but it doesn't matter because eliminating labor cost will always be attractive no matter what the up front cost is to do it. They literally can't NOT do it based on the rules of our game.

If it wasn't MS it would be someone else and is...you think IBM isn't doing this? Amazon? GTFOH. So is every other large company that has a pool of labor that is valued as a cost.

Maybe a better question would be how and why major parts of human life are organized in ways that are bad for the bulk of humanity.

isworenot2··on GitHub Copilot, with “public code” blocked, emits my copyrighted code
The training set for C was algol and a bunch of other languages.

AI could be used to create languages based on design criteria and constraints like C was, but it does bring up the question of why one of the constraints should be character encodings from human languages if the final generated language would never be used by humans...

I mainly think it's funny watching all of these Rand'ian objectivists reusing ever excuse used by every craftsman that was excised from working life...machines need a machinist, they don't have souls or creativity, etc.

Industry always saw open source as a way to cut cost. ML trained from open source has the capability to eliminate a giant sink of labor cost. They will use it to do so. Then they will use all of the arguments that people have parroted on this site for years to excuse it.

I'm a pessimist about the outcomes of this and other trends along with any potential responses to them.