228 karma · joined November 2, 2021
The idea is that people would be more incentivized to build with the land, because it would impact taxes as much, but at the same time they would pay a higher base rate if they underutilize it.
Besides that, the answers you do find are often not helpful. For example, “just use this function in jQuery” - I’m asking about JavaScript, not jQuery.
It’s at least as likely as not that whistleblower incidents like these represent a deeper issue. To stretch the metaphor, if you find a rotten apple in your bunch, it’s unlikely it was the only one.
The reason “can be inaccurate sometimes” is a fundamental flaw is because my assumption is that it will never not be inaccurate. I think it will always be inaccurate sometimes and never be accurate always.
This doesn’t mean it isn’t useful for a lot of applications. But I don’t think it is a holy grail technology, it’s not AGI, and it isn’t going to replace professions.
I think that most artists would agree that these tools can be used to create art. But that’s not what is concerning- it’s that the tools will ultimately be used by people who don’t value art to further devalue it.
There are certain places where many people are masked, so I might wear one to be polite.
If the cost of a product exceeds its value to you, you just don’t buy it. It doesn’t mean you should get it for free.