406 karma · joined November 7, 2014
> What the group wanted to find out was whether the brain signals seen in their study when participants were examining pieces of code resembled the patterns of activation observed when neural networks analyzed the same piece of code. And the answer they arrived at was a qualified yes.
Does this allow meaningful conclusions? I have difficulties to decide whether the article tries make a statement or tries to promote a hypothesis.
Why not let the user decide, which columns to show? You could start with a default, non-intrusive set which the user can expand as liked.
You read over the publishing date (2020).
I see the greatest potential harm in companies trying to "polish" their cracked external image. And for them, "employee-status" verification should be easy to circumvent.
edit: Even disgruntled employee has a legitimate contribution to make.
I do not sign up at such sites. I do not make relevant decisions based on such websites.
I would be absolutely OK with complete lack of verification.
Again, user perspective: You will never get a grasp of the exact work culture at some potential employer by reading subjective comments. As a user i simply take in hints of red flags which i would validate or negate personally by having a chat with some of the folks.
EU Directive 2009/136/EC
Well, it does not as long as the (predictable?) self-censorship sets in. After some time users know not to post pics of vegetable soup if those pics tend to get misclassified.
You can easily replace "US" with other nations and the target audience with their citizens and allies.
By this logic, every nation needs to ramp up space combat capabilities, because their perceived or real enemies could also do so. This train of thought leads to a cold war 'space edition'.
In the long run it will boil down to disaster only preventable by some courageous individuals doing 'the right thing at the right time'. We should better begin stockpiling characters like Stanislav Petrov [1] to make sure we haven't run out of those by then.
Good luck to all of us.
see https://gdpr.eu/eu-gdpr-personal-data/ section "Identifiable individuals and identifiers"
I am too far away from Android development to make any claim about what "app screens" are. Is that android-lingo? Could someone please clarify?
My evil website can no longer access the top secret stuff you are developing on localhost.
My evil website can no longer enumerate the http servers in your local LAN.
Else folks get stuck at "Initializing..." with an exception in the console. Not everybody checks the console.
(TypeError: can't access property "createBuffer")
Edit: stuck at "Initiating..."
But from my understanding, "encryption at rest" is not disk encryption.
If you have a database with disk encryption, once the disk crypto key is entered an attacker could try to "do hacker stuff" and exfiltrate the WAL files.
If you have "encryption at rest", the WAL files are written encrypted and are decrypted on read. An attacker may get your WAL files, but they are still encrypted.
Whether the statement i interpreted is true i cannot tell, but it would be interesting to have data points on it.
> Does this break the chain of trust of evidence? How can any evidence, therefore, be admissible?
Just as advocatus diaboli: If you add a message to a bigger scale drug supplier in the name of one client, you could request an earlier delivery to some location of your choice. This would add content, but not plant any evidence - as the evidence would be the supplier handing you "the keys to the truck". I know nothing about australian law, but i am tempted to think that courts could burn serious time on such a case.
Of course this is dangerous b.s. to have in legislation.
9,195,258 - System and method for synchronizing operations among a plurality of independently clocked digital data processing devices
9,219,959 - Multi-channel pairing in a media system
10,209,953 - Playback device
10,439,896 - Playback device connection
I get your sentiment, really. But where is the tipping point? When does it become the responsibility of an employee to quit? Which atrocity has to be committed after which i cannot claim personal innocence as an employee? (in a general sense, not only facebook)
I am not sure if by technology you mean products or ideas. In case of the latter, that does not sound right. Smart driven persons do not have to be greedy in order to devote their live to something.
As this boils down to legal arguments, are there any clauses (maybe disputed) in the ToS allowing github/MS usage of public repos for such purpose?
Would it even be legally possible to override a software license as a repo provider like "by using this service, you agree to..."?
Firefox AVIF experimental support is disabled by default but can be activated via "image.avif.enabled" flag.
"Huawei’s says it never acted inappropriately by abusing its position in the Netherlands. KPN says in a response that it has no indications that lines were tapped or that customer data was stolen."
Short version:
DOD says footage is real. Nothing more, nothing less.
Jeremy Corbell, a filmmaker, is the only one putting the footage into "alien" territory.
Why is this on HN?
https://blog.golang.org/using-go-modules
Your v5 question should be answered by "part 4":
This might work better than your proposal before.
But the rest sounds plain wrong to me.
Your phone might get stolen, your name might change due to marriage, your address might change because you moved/got evicted. What now?