Unless I'm misunderstanding "turn it off and on again" suggest a kind of pointless, "just start over and try again" kind of suggestion, no?
465 karma · joined March 14, 2019
Unless I'm misunderstanding "turn it off and on again" suggest a kind of pointless, "just start over and try again" kind of suggestion, no?
A notification that is ONLY a notification about something is very unlikely to be malicious (though could certainly be erroneous). My bank will send me a concerning email or SMS about suspicious activity that needs to be reviewed or confirmed, but because they know it's a vector for attack their specifically ask you to call them at their published number listed on your card.
IMO, it is dishonest of YOU to suggest that this form of modern genetic modification is somehow new and scary and untested.
His other channel, Practical Construction, did an in depth step-by-step of installing a sewage pump station.
Maybe five.
I'm starting to think we need to add "advertising" to the list (Death, Taxes, etc).
I imagine you probably won't like this comment, but perhaps you might use it as an opportunity for reflection and self-awareness. If your interest is actually to potentially change someone's mind, and not just "be right", you might consider approaching it in a different way so that your tone doesn't get in the way of the substance of arguments you wish to make.
Just a suggestion. Take care.
If you don't know, go listen to Mr. Scruff, The Herbaliser, Fink, Coldcut, Kid Koala, Bonobo, Blockhead, Talvin Singh, and almost countless more.
Truly a case in point for the value of record labels, imo.
Did someone's internet connection get disabled?
They call it the Creator Responsibility Policy.
>I'm assuming the actual charging equipment has physical, non-remotely-controlled safeguards
I'm assuming the opposite. Incompetence is often surprising.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyaway_Deep_Ocean_Salvage_Sys...
I certainly wouldn't trust my life to an unaudited VPN, but I think your two main points are pretty compelling -- 1) the business model is of large VPN companies is based on trust. They have very explicit, business interest in not violating that trust. 2) in one case we know of, when seized, the servers didn't have actionable information on them.
Does that mean every VPN company is trustworthy? Of course not. Does it mean that things could change at any time? Of course.
If you have some other eComm platform telling T-shirts or whatever, sure there could be fake orders but it wouldn't be all that hard to track down that these THINGS were never sent/made. But anything involving a service...well, it's much harder to prove that those things DIDN'T happen.