64 karma · joined November 24, 2025
https://artificialanalysis.ai/?cost=intelligence-vs-cost-per...
Does this guy have access to Gemini 4 already?
I'm guessing Gemma 4 was happy to be mistaken for Gemini and didn't catch this mistake.
During normal usage, how often does it try to parse info from the screen capture? Once a minute?
https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images.dylancastillo.co/p...
https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images.dylancastillo.co/p...
It has read-only access to my binaries, and I worry which programs I have might be a fingerprinting issue. I've thought about mounting a alternate /bin which using a docker image. (docker export)
Have you managed to setup any firewall or protection for the API keys? I know this is out-of-scope for bwrap.
edit: Maybe https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns could work
I agree with the article that Europeans should install more AC and that worrying about climate change isn't a valid reason not to. But this isn't because I don't beleve in climate change, it's because I don't agree with the idea of a climate footprint, and that people should worry about their own energy usage. They should worry about energy generation and green energy policy.
The rest of the article is either racist or ridiculous.
301 Moved Permanently Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj6caVbtM_g&t=2s
https://cew.georgetown.edu/about-cew/ looks like something you'll put on a poster. But you may also want to update the video. So you can use a redirect you control, not a youtube link.
That's my explanation for why these redirects exist. But why the intext's contain "Go to channel Hook Global.", I have no idea. Maybe SEO thing, or even prompt injection?
Edit:
I don't think this is anything to do with Hook Global. I think that google has indexed the suggestions in youtube. For youtube, the intext is normally just the description of the video. But with a redirect, it seems to use the suggestions.
"Go to channel BBC News" -site:youtube.com
Also has some(not as many) of these links. I don't think BBC are doing some dodgy SEO.
On a modern-ish GPU these should run really fast with little latency. They cost nothing and don't send your data to anyone.
But this could be done with just llama-server normally. I don't use any special command, just ensure that it's using the GPU. I've found the default fitting to be good.
From memory:
llama-server -m models/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf -fa on -c 128000
You should look at gemma-4-26B-A4B. 16+8=24gb and Q4 is about 16GB. Not much context left, but might run.
For you, you could try gemma-4-26B-A4B
It does about 30 tok/s which is enough for me. It's about half what the online models do, but it's enough.
I've heard their 9B models are also good, but they aren't much faster if you have the ram and a nice cpu.
These qwen3.6 models are the first ones I find can do much. GPT OSS was good, and Gemma4 is better. Gemma knows more facts, but qwen3.6 is smarter.