71 karma · joined January 11, 2017
One issue: sharing my results was not great. Pasting in iMessage gave the result text and the image; pasting in discord only gave the text; pasting in telegram only gave the image.
Not sure if this is even your fault, but it doesn’t have as nice of an experience there as Wordle (which I assume you’re trying to emulate).
It seems like you might still get meaningful results for some of your questions, but also that the behavior of the birds could be far more complex than foreseen, and maybe even missed entirely.
I will also note that I think skills like this end up being way more valuable to me as a mentor than hard CS knowledge.
So far the only ideas I’ve come across are the standard “do some related project for resume purposes and then apply to anywhere/everywhere until it works” or “go back to school for a 2nd/more relevant degree and try again”
Neither of which is particularly practical for me, but perhaps this is the way.
It's pretty ridiculous there's no setting in Teams to disable that, and I really hope no one is monitoring those status icons so closely.
Any plans for native mobile apps, or web only?
In any case OP was just trying to point out the entitlement that gets instilled, and how it can be particularly blinding when you’re wrapped up in your own decadent lifestyle. It’s a very common trait among people in the valley, in my experience.
I do wonder how that reconciles with all the social media around though considering the main way recruiters reach out to me is LinkedIn.
>cd ~/Projects/someproject
>wd add . some
From then on you can use `wd some` to warp to that dir.
[1]: https://github.com/kigster/warp-dir
Sure, Github's repo interface probably isn't optimal, but it's not much worse than a minimal personal blog/template. And if you're not concerned with the dev pieces you've at least got the actual no-frills content right there in front of you.
"From now on, I refuse to consider the right tool for the job."
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.
It almost reads like a stoic philosophy of development, which is a pretty fresh idea in contrast to the steady stream of “hey look at this new super convenient tool/framework/lang we created!” posts.
It might be easy to confuse with the purist or masochistic view of “make it harder because it builds character”, but I think there’s a lot of value in being reminded that it’s important to step back and look at the big picture of what problems you’re trying to solve—before solving them!
I haven’t heard the term “squabble index” before, and google returned zilch, but I like it. That being said, I tend to use the comments on HN as a filter for whether or not the article itself will be worth my time. Perhaps this is a flawed heuristic.
However, I’d like to ask:
1) what, to you, makes HN annoying? In my experience it is already a very minimal, light, and quick site. What problem did you aim to solve?
2) does this offer any advantage of the many minimal HN sites? E.g. hckrnews?