your dot or muse will happily do it for you and in fact even send you a notification about it right on your phone
2,338 karma · joined October 3, 2020
your dot or muse will happily do it for you and in fact even send you a notification about it right on your phone
Only to find that it is getting absolutely spammed to death by chinese-looking SEO-farming posts.
I'm surprised Github hasn't picked up or managed to prevent this. When it's this obvious.
Howcome?
It honestly sounds a bit like a teenager's stream of consciousness to me, that's how they sound to me anyways.
There are easy ways to prevent the bloat and wasteful performance though, sth I do deeply care about.
You can get a long way staying on vanilla or picking (for your llm) one of those superfast frameworks like svelte in ny experience :)
A total overhaul is always but a single prompt and 5 minutes away, should the need arise...
You will know intuitively if it's worth taking a closer look or if u can safely close your eyes and just commit it right away.
I usually know which meta questions are crucial to clarify with colleagues and where to check the code punctually.
Are we worried there won't be any problems left for humans to solve anymore?
If you think so... why don't you just go and celebrate?
As I said: prompting correctly and reviewing are still indispensable skills.
Perhaps a lot of devs still have a flawed mental model of how these things even work.
It is absolutely batsh*t crazy insane what SWE has come to in the last cple years.
And yet part of me is loving it.
Not necessarily. I use SOTA models with established stacks like .NET which allow my agent to easily follow decades of best practiced patterns (DI, EF Core, ASP.NET Core...) so you still and up with proper architecture.
In fact I can easily still manually inspect everything bc I already know how it's supposed to be written.
This would be fun to play in groups, comparing answers after each round, but I think the strict timer would make that impossible. Maybe add a different mode?
Also I love the through yet swift feedback on incorrect answers. Did you leverage decision models for that?
sometimes u gotta just ignore economics and instead make history!
I feel like there's gotta be
Just a reminder to simply embrace their superior capabilities instead of feeling threatened.
What the hell is that even supposed to mean?
Sorry but this piece read like total fluff to me, not a single compelling point – just pure fear mongering.
At this point we gotta be more wary of possibly mere attention seekers leaving those companies..
Do they not placate their new model.
Anyway to be clear its not meant that seriously, I'm neither currently on a hill nor ready to die.
> how would this alleged difference (most likely bs) actually show up in reality?
Furthermore: so they admit it's bs but still placate it like its the next biggest thing ever ... alright
All I'm saying is I refuse to buy into it anymore – yet many on here still do, including ... you?