> it can thus be surmised as “One has the right to commit legal actions.”.
The whole point of the constitution is to put a limit on the law. The government cannot pass a law forbidding a certain kind of speech as it would be unconstitutional.
> One already has the freedom to do whatever one wish, so long as it not thread over the bounds of the law.
You have it backwards. The law can dictate whatever it wants so long as it does not thread over the bounds of the constitution.