97 karma · joined April 27, 2020
Its a fair comment.
I had played around with some of the formulas to get everything to be 2^n but it it works better if L(0) is free and houses and mill/mine are 2^(n-1)
1) Ore tier is when the number is represented in binary. 2) I've made a mistake in my writeup here so I was changing the rules a lot as I played it to try and optimise but if you play with L(0) mill/mine being free then follow 2^(n-1) it works better.
3) Picking up and dropping are free, so the cost to move wood from x to y is just the travel cost. If operating, that is the only thing an agent can do. Assignment does not take time but the agent has to travel there.
4) I'll change it in the post but yes 2(n+1)
5) Yes higher ore can always substitute lower grade ore.
6) Yes unlimited batches.
7) I played it as only one building on a cleared square. The reason I'd keep this is because of the nature of houses means you're paying exponentially more for increasing density.
Its always frustrated me how little consideration to the existing study of knowledge is given in AI courses
The expected value is value times probability. And then the time aspect is just discounting future value back to today, like you would a cashflow. Your impulsiveness is then how much you discount tomorrow vs today.
(Expectancy * value)*(impulsiveness)^time
This way you can put a number on your impulsiveness probably from 1.001 to 2
I know how to move dot files between computers but how do I move them across companies?
I don't know if that is an extension of burocracy as such because there may be more automated ways to handle the extra process.
Banks and finance isn't inherently evil but banks that don't optimise the allocation of capital will have less capital and so matter less. Much like in Norm chompskys Manafacturing consent, there is no need for evil actors. The system rewards particular things and that leads to a series of incentives.
What would the "Moral" activity of smart people be? Say you create some simple definition of the most moral action and run with it. Would improving the worlds access to knowledge (Google) not be a part of that? Would connecting communities (Facebook) not be a part of that? Would allowing small sellers of nice products to sell without the hassle of the logistics of online sales not be a part of that (Amazon)? Would creating original media content not beholden to the demands of advertisers not be a part of that (Netflix)?
Would creating the best expression of the mobile device by integrating the hardware and software giving as many people as possible access to leading technology without them having to understand much with regards to the technicalities (I guess that's the apple way?)
Would optimising the allocation of capital so that people can have things before they can afford them not be a part of that? The facilitation of the dream of having it all now while you are young enough to enjoy it rather than saving up for a retirement where you then have a stroke so can do anything with the money you saved. (The situation my grandfather ended up in) Facilitated by the finance industry.
Sure these companies are not monistries. (Although were the preists in those always so angelic) They are not charities, but unlike charities they generate (correctly or not) the resources to aim at their goals.
If a super smart person wanted to target the dreamy goals these companies claim to address but had a better way to address them, what would that way be?
How can you change the world if you do not have the power to allocate capital? The answer is you can't.
The other thing I struggle with is being able to recall things in detail from what I have previously worked on. "What was x called that did Y you were working on last week?" I really struggle with that style of question.
For the spelling of variables names I use vim with spell check and mostly use ctrl+n to complete words so that they are spelt the same throughout. For the memory of function names being able to spin up a repl or run a subset of unit tests/ google/ autocomplete based on the estimated available properties of an object normally get the job done.
There are some really nice spell checks that integrate with vim that check the spelling of the words broken up by underscore so that each is checked individually. That helps a lot when writing a variable for the first time.
Which is a seat we have at the bottom of the garden which gets the last rays before the sun sets. (No other interpretation intended, political or otherwise)
My current understanding of colour is that the colour of an object is defined by the ability of the electrons in the compound jump different energy levels. I don't know if that in itself is enough to result in all the colour we see.
My current understanding of reflection is that because of wavyness of light when lots of light gets absorbed (to my understanding a single photon exciting a single electron to jump some amount) and reemited (the electron falling back down) together the light ends up forming that angle pattern. Under than understanding single photons don't bounce in the same way rays of light do?
I don't know how correct either of those understandings are, but my understanding has been put together from so many places and I've never heard any source explain either like that so I don't trust they are correct.