368 karma · joined April 19, 2009
Yes, I dislike storms, floods and droughts but these are thing we know and we are prepared. And it might be even cheaper to be better prepared for storms than to bear externalized costs of CO2 ... hard to estimate that.
We need some new technology, something very cheap, efficient and disruptive, that will force oil and gas to stay in the ground economically :-|
[sarcasm] so, why transfer this "high cost" to grandchildren, let THEM solve whole problem of "habitability of this moist rock" [/sarcasm]
But really, for most lay people it is better, safer and convenient to just use Apple selected method - to connect everything with one account/Apple ID. And I think that *primary reason* is better product for users. Overall it is easier to control user experience if you tightly control whole platform.
I am not sure if it could be even possible to create broad and well integrated platform similar to what Apple has now, with general opennes. Is there an example of this in any other tech domain?
Counter-example: Linux desktop is nice, functional, very open but so complicated and fragmented ... and it never took off and it is staying as a niche among desktops so far.
There are other players who can make great products like good quality headphones, with standardized components, because they care about product. Although not common behaviour, it means that it can be done. So I think that most manufacturers just don't care enough, probably because most people don't care either :-(
Anyway "Red Mars" sold me the impression of many people being "outside" quite a lot. But with accordance to dust problems this does not seems to be too likely. Moving freely in the world with similar gravity would be probably one of the killer features of colonizing another planet/asteroid.
- Plane was bad, so they band-aided it in factory, but band-aid keeps falling off sometimes. So planes stay grounded.
- Sure, they can make better band-aid but everyone knows planes are bad designed so it won't help much (even if super safe band-aid)
- Correct way is to rebuild the plane to make it good, but this is/was out of the table - it was already way too expensive in the first place.
And here we are.
Also it helps if you live somewhere with reasonable humidity.
I used and liked Gleebox quite intuitive, easy and powerful. But it is not developed anymore. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gleebox/miinkdcjgl...
In other parts of Europe, road traffic is often much faster that speed limits (Central and Southern Europe) and drivers are not cooperative at all. Yeah, nothing that separated bike roads wouldn't solve.
Yeah, that one. Your country is ridiculously flat with highest peak of around 300m above see level.
On the other hand, there are a lot of raining days in Netherlands! I was very surprised that Dutch don't care too much about weather, they ride on sunny days same as on rainy days.
Actually, the best way to demonstrate it is via these rules:
(1) you have to get something that is very hard to get (more money than you normally have),
(2) something that has no use for you (you want to convince her, it wouldn't be convincing if you benefitted from spending)
(3) and preferrably it is not monetizable for recipient (in general, woman is much less motivated to tricking you only because of gift)
So, if she's already convinced to merry you, spending fortune for diamond ring is futile. And if you are in hurry, you can really just burn some money to ash in front of her, it would do the same :) Nonetheless, not as fancy as diamond ring for her :D
Still dont know what lesson I should learn from this story.