upcoming was bought by yahoo in 2005.
I totally agree that the sites are built for the promoters and not the users. The biggest problem I see how can this be built for the users and make money at the same time, any ideas?
I think this has some potential to allow more developers to publish a web app with at least a decent looking ui. There are a lot of good backend developers who happen to be bad at ui, this might allow more potential customers to view the product instead of being horrified as soon as they saw the ui.
btw, I am in Guangdong currently, I'm pretty sure it is nothing like Silicon Valley. There are lots of computer component factories here, but not really any web companies.
We use a mix of Google Analytics, awstats, and webalizer. Awstats and Webalizer are post process your weblogs so they don't really effect the performance of your website.
I really want to get one, but it doesn't meet my basic needs. I need to be able to properly display technical books and the other problem is it doesn't support Chinese fonts, so I can't read chinese on it. What I like is that I don't need to carry tons of books with me. When I moved to China last year, I brought a whole suitcase of technical books, a pain to carry around.
Its been about 3 months since we switched, so far its useful, when we have new features, we create a new branch just for that feature so we can isolate the code from the rest of the base. Then when the feature is done, we merge it with the main branch. Its also awesome to be able to commit when you don't have internet access.
Hi, thanks for the reminder, we put our emails in the application itself and not in our profiles, but we just updated them. I hope not having the emails in our profiles didn't effect anything.
I've recently switched to git from svn and it is pretty good so far. Git allows having a centralized server, it just needs to be enforced at the human level, not at the software level.