60 karma · joined January 22, 2014
Because it is not so focused on people as much as it is with "people in cities." Cities are the future of low carbon emissions. So specifically simulating and visualizing the happiness of people within cities is huge. There is great potential for this work.
Simulation of human life combined with reality capture and BIM software are going to change the game. So-much-so that the market price of commodities like copper and aluminum are going to become of GLOBAL interest.
This could not have come at a better time than when scientists are freaking out about the Great Barrier Reef being almost completely dead.
Let me explain! Put yourself in CEO's shoes: you have employees who love working for you but you need to get them a paycheck. From that perspective, it is easy to see that it is kind of crazy to enter into these lengthy government discussions that could possibly ruin your business and delay the entire industry! No thanks!!
If they're all really engineers who just love doin' the work, they will be a valuable contracting outfit doin' the exact same work for a steadier paycheck.
I was going to ask if he has access to a smartphone to take and send photos of paper?
Set up a server for it. Hell turn it into a business.
When should I be using which sort of funding?
There's a lot of factors.
Look at OpenRave. It's the result of an academic open sourcing his research.
I just think at the end of the day, a research paper exists to validate human understanding of nature - not give you a boilerplate for implementing it.
For example, OpenRave is the result of academics open sourcing their research.
Update: Someone posted a link to the code.
Code = Applying Nature.
They are scientists: they are best at testing, explaining, and documenting nature.
Code is an engineer's job: making it as fast and robust as possible for the given application or with the latest tools.
They want to make you work for it :)