84 karma · joined July 13, 2012
I've been blogging for about 20 years. Exactly what I write about has changed over that time (of course), but in recent times I've been writing about my PhD (applying purely-functional programming to distributed stream processing); cultural stuff I like, books, music, in particular Nintendo Switch games recently; free software stuff, particularly around Linux and Debian (I'm a Debian developer); note-taking and personal productivity; reading and archiving old media (minidiscs, ZIP drives, stacks of DVD-Rs, floppy disks); my fledgling adventures in 3D printing; retrocomputing and restoring my old Commodore Amiga; various classic Doom hacking projects I've worked on; running and maintaining a DIY free software NAS; computing history and preservation…
I wouldn't normally post in a thread like this but a friend put me up to it. Any feedback appreciated.
That is awkward sometimes yes. Record fields are functions, and you can't have two functions with the same name in the same namespace.
You can, however, use namespaces to import two separate modules with conflicting names. It does mean you have to define the two different records in two different modules.
If, you want different records to have common fields because they are conceptually related, you probably want to use type classes.
Much the same sort-of chronology and hosting story for me…
> For my real-name vanity domain, I went with a `.org`, since I didn't want to be a `.com` in personal life, though today I'd prefer `.net`.
I'm curious to pick your brains on that. I've gone the other way: I ended up standardising on a .net but I kinda wish I had the .org instead, my rationale is, .org is a closer match to what my site is: if I squint I can consider it to be an "organisation" of one, but I can't convince myself that it or I'm a network. I originally picked the .net because I thought it scanned better with my choice of domain.
And what should the top match for John Carmack be, in your opinion? Where is his homepage?
FWIW on Bing I got his Wikipedia article first and his twitter accoount second, which seems like sensible results in his case.
I'd say Crispy Doom (or Doomretro on Windows) are good balances.
I love many aspects of the BBC but sadly not their news output anymore.
(Sorry I realise this has very little to do with the R&D article.)
There were, however, three distinct zombie death noises, independent of pitch shifting.