HN is an echo chamber.
83 karma · joined May 6, 2014
HN is an echo chamber.
But they do mention that they "[controlled] for percent of age >50 yr." Does that imply that, per county, they excluded high-elevation suicides that wouldn't have happened at lower elevations, using known mortality rates for common causes-of-death for age > 50 individuals?
I'm sure the answer is in the paper somewhere, but I need to get back to work. :-)
General Relativity posits that gravity embodies both of those qualities you mentioned.
It is a force that bends space and dilates time.
Otherwise my internal monologue is a combination of notions, visions, and words.
Do you think in complete sentences?
During a discussion of said company's defiance of a federal judge, such a critique seems pertinent to me!
We have continually observed the most powerful actors in our system abusing it in consistent ways: cornering markets, becoming monopolies, bullying smaller companies, constructing walled gardens, diminishing the concept of consumer ownership, etc.
I think we ought to allow comments like theirs in discussions like this.
0/10.
And incidentally (getting back to the original point of the article), both models feature a pretty flat front-end for a minivan. I wouldn't be surprised if they are considered among the least pedestrian-safe vehicles of the class.
I would consider that an isolated incident, similar to the "vaccines cause autism" researcher who was discredited long ago (and hopefully the Cassava guy will be, too).
You fixed nothing.
I'm shocked YouTube didn't steer me to this sister channel. Thank you!
It's clear that the "no idea how to fly" guy actually had plenty idea, when you listen to the full audio.
Personally, I would perhaps allow this turn of phrase in reference to take-off and cruising, depending on equipment and assuming VFR, but I'm not sure I would ever say this about LANDING any plane.
Source: I'm an occasional student-pilot.
The author is extremely paranoid. She uses the word "should" a whole lot, but does not back up her dictatorial statements with any reasoning.
This article has failed to scare me as intended.
I'm continually triggered by this horrible pattern that frustrates me and wastes my time.
In turn, I think it is arrogant of UI designers to assume that everybody will automatically understand what their icons mean, and that it's worth my time to repeatedly hover over them to get to things they should want me to find.
Twitter missed out on a huge opportunity. They should have listened to investors who user their platform.
Anyway, I absolutely love this idea! I signed up and am poking around now. I think I already like this more than Benzinga, Stocktwits, SeekingAlpha, you-name-it.
Sorry I fulminated, fellow hackers. I will do better.
Perhaps they are bitter about lacking the gumption to handle such situations professionally and ethically? Perhaps they avoid any and all critical conversations with the people they work with? Enjoy watching all of your ventures fail!
Or maybe it's: conducting themselves like professionals while concealing their sexism just breaks their poor rich brains.
If I'm actually developing something that's part of a greater whole, then I'm using a fully fledged IDE like PyCharm (but with the VIM emulator plugged in for when I need it, of course ;-D).
Likewise, no shade at Emacs, though. Several of my favorite colleagues use it!
When I meet people in real life, it's usually at a bar or club. It's not healthy to go out drinking every weekend, so there's one major advantage. Also, I get to meet people who don't go to bars and clubs (or, those that don't go to the ones that I frequent).
Avoiding rejection isn't really that much of a "plus" for me. But avoiding the BS of the occasional girl who plays you for free drinks, gets pulled away by a friend, etc. is a definite plus.
Another thing; I haven't had great luck with "being set up" with friends-of-friends. In my experience, it has never been a good match. Like, not even close.