If either of those is wrong, I’d say they both are.
62 karma · joined October 5, 2021
If either of those is wrong, I’d say they both are.
Reminds me of when my motorcycle was towed from my apartment complex. It was held by a private towing company, but for some reason the city suspected the bike was stolen, so the tow lot (allegedly) couldn't release it until the city completed their 'investigation'. Meanwhile I was on the hook for every day that it sat in the tow yard (not to mention the rental car to get to work), but powerless to get it out. Eventually the city cleared it and I owed like 2k. I desperately wish I fought it but for some reason I just paid it...
Who instituted the limit? Was it in the lease terms, city ordinances, or something else?
debase lets you edit your git repo using drag and drop in your terminal. I didn't want a full GUI because I prefer using git from the terminal, but rebasing is often easier when done visually rather than textually. So debase tries to fill that gap.
debase supports macOS (x86_64 / arm64) and Linux (x86_64). I spent a fair amount of time on it so I decided to make it shareware ($10) but it has a 7-day trial.
Anyway, would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
> And it’s worth noting that trying to license the image would have been moot. When asked how much he would’ve charged for a license, Maisel told his lawyer that he would never have granted a license for the pixel art.
https://transcripts.thedealr.net/script.php/black-mirror-ban...
I think your response exactly illustrates the point of the post: if upstream and downstream had clearer names, you wouldn't need to define them. And if they indeed mean what you say, wouldn't producer and consumer be clearer?
> I don't really see the point it's trying to make - we use technical terms not to be human friendly but to be technical.
I don't think I can agree that technical terms aren't meant to be human friendly. After all, languages exist to convery ideas to other humans; words aren't opcodes intended to be executed by machines.
If technical terms aren't meant to be human friendly, why did humans invent them at all? And if they are intended to be human friendly, why not optimize them for clarity and precision?