You know it will be annoying.
12,217 karma · joined September 18, 2016
You know it will be annoying.
Eg. Flock cameras don’t help the military but do help the police state.
Any speakers of either language able to confirm or deny?
If you can’t beat them, join them right?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER
It’s not a solvable problem.
There just isn’t enough information in plain text to do this and we should stop pretending there is.
If we need to verify something isn’t made with ai then we need other ways of doing so - eg looking at a document edit history, doing it as an exam, oral defense.
There are options! But pretending you can tell if text is ai will only catch out people who make no effort to hide it and will inevitably have false positives.
It’s just not a reasonable ask.
Eg. Mayonnaise contained eggs and oil instead of the weird crap + sugar mayonnaise is made of now.
Also even things like the vegetables has more minerals in and the chicken had less fat in it.
I’ve noticed a similar effect when it snows here in london. It’s unusual and it’s like a common adversary to everyone and everyone becomes more chatty on public transport
And In order to make an ad campaign make financial sense, you MUST have a subscription app. Because just getting one download will cost you at least $3 which is already over the cost an app used to cost.
and your conversion rate to paid might be only 10 or 20:1. So you need to make $30 per customer
So as well as being annoying at the moment of seeing them, ads in the AppStore are directly contributing to the general enshitification of apps.
It seems like they’d be so useful - so there must be a good reason there aren’t lots of them normally?