1,075 karma · joined May 8, 2016
I’m kind of curious though: what value do their web drivers have to them now that they couldn’t just release them as OSS and allow a determined group to rewrite them as Metal.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.“
Could be argued that this is a covenant of sorts the federal government is making with the people and/or states. In a sense, could be argued individual states wouldn’t need to honor it to individuals provided they don’t include such language in their own constitutions (I’d assume there is said language, but don’t know).
The only issue I see with the “bad ideas” thing is that it requires a lot of effort on the part of the person doing the debunking. They have to provide data points, citations, etc. to counter whatever was put out and in a lot of cases, it is just ignored in favor of the bogus bit that started the whole thing (which in some cases requires some degree of effort on the part of the originator, in other cases spitballing gets them there).
I’m somewhere in the middle. I worry about cases where seemingly the only wrong committed is to hold an opposing view, but in cases where someone willfully put forth bogus information, I’m not terribly opposed. Would rather that the sources for where the conclusions were drawn were similarly provided, at least then I could assume some degree of good faith. But if you and I are looking at two pieces of data and come to differing conclusions, that in and of itself should not lead to either of us being “silenced.”
I don't know if the fact that I was looking at said recommended list is what negates the issue you're talking about, but I had minimal issues in my build (mine was from also including a PCIe to 8 SATA port card. Moved the main drive off of it, installed the drivers and started working fine). Initially tried to do a Windows VM w/ GeForce 1080 but scrapped it after driver issues with the device in VM (apparently, Nvidia doesn't want non-Quadra GPUs in VMs).
So an internal application I work on has communication between teams where first + last isn't a given. So I'm constantly paranoid if I'm going to get it right (usually just don't communicate name at all, just make statements).
Fast forward to a month ago when I started working on a rewrite and while constructing the users (and actually making them users within a company instead of effectively companies themselves), I added an enum for NameOrder and separated the two fields.
Not particularly important to the application in the grand scheme of things, but geez, it feels mildly freeing that it won't be so ambiguous in the future.
From a web perspective (and my experience), .NET Framework 2/4 -> Core is actually not a big changeover outside of the views (probably better if you switched to MVC).
The Windows Phone apps I built are dead now, but that isn't a matter of APIs no longer being supported, but an entire platform going under.
As a macOS user, I had one operating system update kill external GPU w/ Nvidia cards (that sucked) and another update kill 32 bit apps (that one isn't a big one for me personally). All on the same computer.
If I can figure that out, may be in love.
I don't think a client/group requiring a set and forget (well, not quite forget, but to be hands off) is necessarily a bad client nor is one that wants continuous updates a good one. In some cases, it could be reversed because the set and forget client who disappears was most likely able to clearly define requirements as they needed them and they had the foresight to include anything that might come along ahead of time (or probably more likely, their use case is rigid and doesn't change).
I was actually looking at this a few days ago because I've been very interested in implementing something like Google's Project Stream locally where I can render things in the browser, but frame rate is important for me.
But fair point, I didn't consider that when saying drugs. Meant more along the lines of drugs that work could come down on me for (marijuana and up. Personally, I think if alcohol and cigarettes are legal, so too should marijuana, but the legalization of it wouldn't change my non-use of it. Just seems a stupid prohibition to have within the context.).
Think the obvious one is that the results are shared and whether someone is a criminal or not (or will be one in the future), people are not particularly comfortable with sharing to parties they didn't initially trust it to for the purposes they trusted it for.
Anecdotally, I bought a 23andme kit (just the genealogy one) but never submitted it because the labeling was to send it to the lab in the next town that manages the company I work for's drug screenings. Well, I don't think I have any pre-existing conditions and certainly don't do drugs, but I don't know about any unknowns on the health side that could impact my insurance if they were to share it to the company. Forget that.
I appreciate that they sent something, but sometimes it'd be nice for them to allow someone to access the data related to them that was exposed as they say "our analysis of the support information indicates that specific personal or organizational identifiable information related to your support case was potentially visible." Okay, what specific personal or organizational identifiable information of mine was visible?
I assume the representative or I may've listed said info in our communications back and forth so let me see what was exposed so I can make a judgement of what, if anything, I should do here.
The only way I can see that working is if there is some kind of geographic location of various stops and the like, but at that point, you need consistent connectivity to obtain that kind of data, right? May work in larger towns and cities, but what about rural areas?
I might be misreading, but I don't think they were advocating avoiding solar/wind/etc. (just that they weren't easy wins).
For library management, GOG 2 (Alpha) is the best solution I've personally seen (have the various storefronts installed, import the connector for GOG 2, all the games from that storefront are imported into GOG 2, can install/play/etc. on a whim).
If entrusting it to the Linux Foundation leads to more internationalization of the project, that can only be a win for the LF and Chinese OSS as a whole.
Personally, I’d much rather Chinese developers operate within the global community than outside of it. And things like this are just another bullet point in that.
Windows on ARM is probably fine. Windows Phone and the like eventually lost (losing? I haven’t kept up) support, but phones are traditionally a 2ish year supported device and then they’re not targeted (specifically in the Android OEM arena). Windows proper they have business clients and if they don’t support it for a reasonable amount of time, Microsoft is basically hosed. It is, I imagine, why once they decided to kill off older IEs everything prior to latest and greatest was killed at the same time: they had supported them for far too long and it required killing them all Off in one move.
It is fine if they want to kill off features off upcoming hardware, but killing off the capacity to use something that was used for months is not the best look. If Metal Only was the goal, add a prompt when someone enables said web drivers that they’re going off the reservation snd that they assume the risk.
These release notes seem to be Nvidia giving up the ghost that they’re going to be able to resolve this dispute and High Sierra is the last release where all but a couple of really old Nvidia GPUs work.
So the trademark was protected it would appear. Even though the infringing company makes a good case (laches) for selling said products without regard from the fraternities/sororities for decades (in fact, they were selling to these organizations, so they were generally aware of the company's existence and practices).
Per this posting from a law firm [1], as your question is stated with the inclusion of "might" the answer is yes. Apparently it can go one of three ways: abandoning, not impacting/abandoning, or diminishing. Two of these results are bad for the trademark holder.
I'd assume a C&D letter would be sufficient to get a proper result or at least should be the first move in these matters, but I'm not a lawyer nor play one on TV or online.
[1] https://www.dbllawyers.com/can-lose-trademark-rights-dont-su...
https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/18/20970743/roku-pokemon-sw...
Nintendo Switch uses the USB-C connector, but they're off spec which lead to people breaking their devices by connecting them to cabling/docks that weren't to the Switch's implementation. Think there was more nuance to it than just that, but grand scheme of things, the whole fiasco around that highlights concerns as no one wants to brick their devices.
This seems like a relatively easy fix that as you mention isn't 100%, but exists. On my MacBook Pro, the only reason I know my ports are Thunderbolt is because I know their specifications: the ports aren't marked in any particular way. The body/bodies involved with USB/Thunderbolt should make it a requirement that ports (and perhaps cables) indicate what it is capable of in a similar way to how USB 3.x TypeA/B cables have blue coloring within the port and the plug. At that stage, if I see a blue colored port or plug, I know I'm dealing with a 3.x USB one. If you refuse/can't meet the specification, you then shouldn't be able to use USB Type C for your product.
Instead, in their rush to get everything on USB Type C, they have seemingly tossed out any pretense of standards needing to be met to use the port and may stifle the port's adoption going forward.
Memory modules do have RGB, but you specifically have to buy them (they're the exception, currently). CPUs don't have RGB, but the fans that are going to be mounted on them may be (Ryzen's CPU fans that come with the CPUs have them iirc). I don't see HDD/SDD going the RGB route considering they tend to be somewhat obfuscated, but the faster storage sticks that are all the rage in gaming PCs now may be a candidate (I say that mostly because of the RGB memory modules mentioned earlier).
It is a trend I wish didn't happen, honestly, but I know it is a case of trying to consolidate and appease two audiences (performance hungry users and enthusiasts) so it is what it is.
A more straight up click based one w/o much of a graphical component would probably be AdVenture Capitalist or the like.
And then the update after High Sierra happened and killed it outright. And as much as I'd rather boot into macOS for non-gaming items, because my monitor hooks into the eGPU, I boot into Windows for anything asides Xcode which is pretty heavy. Could stick to High Sierra, but that isn't exactly an option.
It truly is a shame that we couldn't just be allowed to change a flag or confirm a prompt to maintain business as usual. As such, this may be my last Apple branded PC and will just use it as a build machine in the future whenever I inevitably upgrade.
Maybe Nvidia and Apple will work together on metal drivers, but quite frankly, it is the edgiest of edge cases so I imagine the chances of that are minuscule. That isn't to say I don't somewhat understand their reasoning: they basically appear to be scaling back numbers of areas they can't safeguard or require support (non-metal drivers and 32-bit respectively). But at that point it seems like provide something that users can do to bypass it.
This home internet thing is basically a hotspot for your home. As such, I would guess the answer is "it depends."
I would also not pay for this as I already have T-Mobile One w/ International Plus option (+$25/month) that gives unlimited hotspot. It actually was my home internet for almost a year, until Spectrum setup in the neighborhood (previous provider was trash. Capping at 10 Mbps, "peak hours" of 3pm-2am, etc.). But if I didn't have the previously mentioned option and Spectrum hadn't come in yet? Oh, for sure, would be all over it.
Office 365 that is interesting because on a clean install, I still had to go to office.com to install it. I didn't have icons for Word, Excel, Powerpoint, etc. and certainly not the GBs of data already consumed by it. I'm looking at my work machine at the moment and it has an "Office" tile that I can sign in and use the web versions, but it doesn't appear to be a full Office install.
I know people who work within their industry (health care) in a specific place that tends to be low paying. They could very easily switch (because people have tried recruiting them to do so because they worked with them previously and they know they're good) to a higher paying job with a lighter workload without moving but servicing a different group. But part of the appeal of the job is that they are working in support of this specific class of patients.
Dunno, I could see aspects other than money being a driver in someone sticking with something when a better opportunity or situation seems to be present with little effort.