1,146 karma · joined March 27, 2014
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12059810
Mylan made claims that were false.
Edit: the alternative is that the $465M payment is a bribe
"we can do anything we want"
Does anyone know if there are any other demos/applications available?
Laziness is a virtue; at least among programmers. "Writers" just use different language.
Writing to say you write is just creating needless noise at best, and perhaps a kind of technical debt at the worser ends.
If you have something to write, write it. If you don't, you don't (because you are doing something else).
I cannot imagine what Twitter is spending its time doing.
It's baffling bad.
> A Texas banker who was so frustrated with regulators in 2011 that he gave up his banking charter and sold off his branches is now overseeing the sale of the rest of the company to Warburg Pincus LLC for about $300 million.
The title should at least get a year parenthetical on the Banker (who is not a banker [0]) claim, or maybe you can show me Depping's new charter?
[0] at the nonbank
Also, I now get the impression that this game plan is not so much a plan any more, but an operating enterprise since 2011.
A nonbank seems to be an independent loan counter, likely backed by multiple banks.
So, they create some money at one bank, then sell it to another bank (while doing the work required); essentially.
>CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
>ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
>SEC. 2. (a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press.
Was Yahoo given a contract, or otherwise compensated?
If UC uses its lawful property ownership powers (or any other) to restrict someone's speech, it has acted contrary to the CA Constitution.
What is the purpose of that wall of text you pasted?
I'm not sure of any court decisions. Someone would need to be restricted by the University and challenge it to produce a case. I don't know if that has happened yet.
Which is prohibited.
UC cannot enforce copyright, NDAs, or other restrictions of speech. I think there is a very good argument that UC is unable to enforce (or even hold) a patent.
> Article 1, Section 2 (a). Sentence 2 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1