But it is still cheaper to stockpile some generators and gas than stockpile a cybertruck. If there's an EV charging station up within a 1 hr drive, gas stations are also going to be up.
1,332 karma · joined March 23, 2026
But it is still cheaper to stockpile some generators and gas than stockpile a cybertruck. If there's an EV charging station up within a 1 hr drive, gas stations are also going to be up.
Don't you mean "learn grammar"?
If you're going to be an insulting pedant, at least be correct about it.
How were his orgies any different in moral character than the orgies the effective altruists throw?
Just use a USB adapter with a decent antenna.
That phrase has as much inherent meaning as "the goal of software" or "the goal of technology." People have different goals for technology and society. This is normal.
Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
Take that stick out of your ass.
> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars
Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.
(Reposting this as a top level comment in case the low effort one I reply to gets downvoted)
The real issue is not the damages, but:
> whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars
Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.
Any sufficiently advanced theft prevention device is indistinguishable from a stalking device.
You're still stalking the movements of the person who stole your bike, until they ditched it. The fact that the device can no longer stalk them if they threw it in a dumpster does not mean you aren't still tracking their movements from where they stole your bike to the dumpster.
In that moment when you see your cut bike locks on the ground where you parked your bike, and you pull out your phone to track it, your first instinct is that someone stole it and you want to follow their movements after they stole it.
We're also very litigious, as it isn't hard to convince a jury to award damages to a fellow moron.
Meanwhile at $bigco I just got my request to buy a shitty $1k Dell laptop denied because I got one 2 years ago and I have to wait 1 more.
The winning submission was SCIENTIFIC FRAUD claiming to be from a medical instrument. The competition was not to produce something that was aesthetically pleasing or that would pass as real images recorded from a camera. Just like the point of the Tour de France is not to be the very fastest in any 2 wheeled vehicle.
But you're right, this isn't slop, it's worse. It's an entitlement that comes with the worst parts of tech hype grifter scenes like NFTs and crypto altcoins. If you can get away with lying and cheating, then it is not just morally okay but a moral obligation.
What in the hell are you talking about?
I don't think their point was about knowing the stack, but being able to point a harness at something running on your desktop GUI and say "change this".
Being able to edit and recompile pretty much any part of the OS and userland (often not even needing to reboot!) is not something that can be said about Windows for sure, or even lots of things on Macs too. Or even when the browser is effectively the operating system, the JS/TS others write is also hard to change in your end.