61 karma · joined June 11, 2021
Also, advertising every file in torrent (of unsuspecting user) to entire world would be a HUGE privacy flaw.
Anecdote: Remember when Microsoft Corp. declared what they love open source software and launched CodePlex platform, and then lost their business interest in it (when they bought GitHub) so they completely erased CodePlex archives? I was able to reach several long forgotten project I was interested in thanks to invaluable work of independent volunteer archivists. (It was quite tough manual job for me, I had to d/l database then locate desired archive segment and only then could transfer required files via bittorrent proto)
But why FDA is to blame? Just get it from nearby euro-drugstore and do your unlicensed fix.
But they ain't some kind of special villains, its today's monopoly market kicked in. Selling startuprs to Yahoo comes with consequences.
> capable of laundering open source code That's an exaggeration. Copilot is still a dumb machine which accidentally learned to mimic the practice of borrowing intellectual property from human coders.
But anyway... Why should I give up my freedoms just because of someone's parenting failures? Irresponsible parents are putting their children in danger, not the ABSOLUTE freedom of speech. Which isn't a subject of quid pro quo, really. And even not because my libertarian views on this matter, but because it simply doesn't work otherwise.
Curious thing is, you yourself dropped into gcc studying tool discussion clearly having no idea what I was criticizing in it.
When tampering gubment censorship, one should apply the usual opsec rules and thus stick to mature and proven solutions and refrain from experimenting. This means Tor or reputable commercial VPN provider, not yet-another-tor-killer. And the developers in general should invest more efforts into low-level attacks like GoodbyeDPI instead.
It is a war. There is no demand for this euphemism.
And no, free speech is absolute thing, otherwise it simply doesn't work.
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither.
A Bored Chinese Housewife Spent Years Falsifying Russian History on Wikipedia
She “single-handedly invented a new way to undermine Wikipedia,” says a Wikipedian.*
Very typical for today's world where javascript coder counts as software engineer.
> For me, JavaScript became my primary language and stays
Oh, my God! Computer science of leftPad.js strikes back.
I presume the famous American educashun kicked in and geographically spoiled the slogan of bad bad America.
Worth to mention paid very well and still receiving retirement plan benefits.
i think management put higher priority in the new project and needed more experienced engineers to get that going as fast as possible
Everyone is searching their Self.
It won’t be enough when you are not searching your Self, no matter what you have.
It will be enough when you are searching your Self, no matter what you have.
By being indexed by bots and published on the Web, it’s just more human eyes. If you just want certain human eyes, then you instead need access control.
By trying to exclude machines you just make it harder for humans to use the information, like copy pasting, text-to-speech, screen readers for the blind, etc.
Yes, they also firmly keep the claim that fresh doesn’t have a build step. Hint: It does [^1]. They’ve just hidden it for most people by making it part of the local testing.
But I guess static rendering would go against their mantra of “no build step”, which even currently is actually false, as they need to generate the manifest file.
I doubt we invent AI out of our kindness of hearts, our love for consciousness. We would otherwise care more deeply for nature, animals, and each other. Would we destroy biodiversity? Would we let people starve in third world countries?
Humans want to maximize their comfort. They want to offload work to someone or something else. AI is the ultimate worker. Built by humans. (Still) controlled by humans. A machine slave.
Maybe having machine slaves is fine. Or maybe not. It comes down to the same one question: can a machine be a living conscious being, like an animal, like a human?
Meanwhile Google continues to create more machine slaves. Time will tell.
Matrix