jvsg

This remind me that Chesterton in his book Orthodoxy said that if Nietzsche was really an egoist, he would not be preaching it.

>you can force people to marry, but you can't make them care about each other

That's incorrect. Arranged marriages are forced in some sense, but people do come around to care. Put a man and woman together in captivity and they start caring for each other. That's how human nature is.

And regarding the gunpoint thing, there's something called Bride kidnapping in central asia. Ofcourse those brides cry for first few days or so, but eventually settle in, with equal or probably more happiness than the women of the so called free world.

a.k.a the tinder jesters. I think it takes loosing a big dump of self esteem to "compete" for attention in this way.

It's legal if you have the will. Most men don't want to meet prostitute. I think they have the desire to be desired, for what they are, and not for their wallet.

keep in mind that jeffery epstein's death news was first broken on 4chan before MSM picked it up.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/4chan-jeffrey-epstein-...

4chan is not just an image board, but an intelligence service too.

Blacks make up 13% of U.S population but 74.4% of NBA, and 30% of Hollywood. Is that meritocracy or priviledge?

It is India's internal matter. Let India deal with it.

The sinhalese people of Sri Lanka are Indo-European, not dravidian. IIRC they came from Modern day Bengal.

yep. Me too. In my case, my bank was unable to process that amount of payment so they eventually had to strike it off my bill.

> They make more than enough money by providing the Internet service

So you are going to decide whether they are making enough money? Don't like tracking? Switch over to a privacy respecting ISP.

My firefox 66.0.4 doesn't trust the certificate for the website you posted.

Edit: Oh wait the link doesnt work for me even!

The same kulcha warriors also decriminalized homosexuality. While your favorite party (read family) was not able to for decades of their rule.

That's incorrect IMHO. The Mughals had ruled over an area greater than India's current area. The Marathas too had almost replaced Mughals after their downfall, and the British replaced Marathas. There was infighting in a few kingdoms towards the south and the east, and that's where the British gained their initial territory.

There was a concept of a united India/Hindustan/Bharat/Aryavart in Ancient times.