479 karma · joined February 13, 2011
I'd usually be drawn to hoarding patches, and organizing them, and labelling and maintaining. With a modular synth, I can only produce in the moment. I find that really freeing.
I'm a hobbyist, and not a professional musician, i might think different if I did this to make money.
the latest project i've been working on this has been really good. So I may have judged too quickly.
Might have its uses in a tightly controlled harness, but for coding I'm switching back to a mix of K3/GLM-5.2/Deepseek V4 Flash 0731
GLM 5.2 is slower for sure (although they offer a fast version), and it's more expensive. But in my experience, it's universally better than Deepseek V4-flash-0731. Don't get me wrong, the new Flash version is amazing.
But the use cases I have looked at are about source code understanding, bug finding, etc. - GLM 5.2 is clearly better.
I think by using some prompt engineering, you will probably be able to close this gap, but some extra work is needed.
And I'll say it again: the new Flash version is amazing. I love it. That level of intelligence for the price is unprecedented, and the fact that it's open weights and runs locally makes me genuinely happy.
In Chrome: right-click, inspect. Edit page source. Done. Less than two minutes, and you don't need to have a tech background to do it.
Never trust screenshots.
It turns out that a coroutine is just a function that the compiler should not inline: https://github.com/sustrik/libmill/blob/master/libmill.h#L24...
> non-progressive
I'm not sure what you mean by progress, exactly, but policy simplicity is progress IMHO.
Good point. The problem with that is, of course, that you may not be aware of others existing.
> There is no silver bullet...
+1
Disclaimer: I'm not making a value statement here :-)
Agreed. To me, it seems that encryption should be uncontroversially accepted from the populations's standpoint, while gun policies have valid arguments for and against.
Basically: it's really hard to shoot someone in the face with pgp.