kajic

For this reason, discoveries made by AI will be immensely useful for accelerating scientific progress, even if those discoveries are opaque at first.

That said, I’m not surprised performance came up in interviews with experts; they probably have tons of interesting performance-related stories to tell from their extensive work on graphs.

Mostly poems and paintings.

I come to think about the adage that scientific answers often bring with them more questions. Those ever expanding questions I sometimes imagine as an exponentially growing circumference of unknowns, surrounding a circle of what’s currently known.

Perhaps those unknowns could be thought of as corresponding to the gray and black balls, so that what’s dangerous is essentially that which we don’t fully understand and therefore cannot fully control.

Finally, I’m thinking that the area covered by all previously gathered knowledge (area because knowledge synergies with itself) will increasingly likely outweigh the danger that we uncover as the circumference of unknowns grows and dangers are discovered along the perimeter.

Answer: 2030

That makes sense. I’ll try moving the site to a different domain and submitting my seventh appeal.

If this is indeed the problem, it’s hard to understand why their support agents couldn’t have divulged this information in one of my six previous appeals.

I seem to have a talent for upsetting computer programs.

I think some people downvoted this question of mine, so I’ll try to clarify my thinking.

Google is paid by advertisers to refer people to their content.

I was paid Wolt credits by Wolt to refer people to their service.

It seems to me that providing people with a promo code that they find valuable, and that Wolt finds valuable is providing a similar kind of value as Google’s own advertisements, even if mine is minuscule, and even if I use Google to advertise it.

Exactly. I would be happy to change the domain name if they bothered to tell me that this is in fact the problem.