kantos2

So what?

>Getting human bodies to decompose underground is not trivial.

This is simply not true

but the questions is: Does really spreading Christchurch video have any negative consequences?

Without answer to this question we cant censor speech and say we are not totalitarians.

>I know plenty of people in tech that are adverse to the idea of government regulating tech, but at the same time do not believe it is right for the small segment of the population working in tech to decide what conversations we are and are not allowed to discuss

Government also are small segment of the population, moreover politicians don't understand the topic.

Cloudflare and other tech pundits just want to be free from consequences of their decisions. If gov tell them to censor they would just say, its not us, its you country law.

This is purely PR endeavor.

So what?

What you mean by > great contributor that plays against you.

How? How contributor plays against you if you don't contribute anything?

>Career success is fulfilling. This is the lie we foist on the young >I remember when the editor of my first book called to tell me it had made the best-seller list. It felt like … nothing.

Man is projecting.

This article is crap

>Life is an individual journey. This is the lie books like Dr. Seuss’ “Oh, the Places You’ll Go” tell. In adulthood, each person goes on a personal trip and racks up a bunch of experiences, and whoever has the most experiences wins.

He made up some idiotic statemet, that no one brings up, and act like it was problem in society.

Sorry, but no https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/07/050705004113.h...