HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

kasdkashdkas

25 karma · joined April 27, 2015

submissionscomments
kasdkashdkas··on Random Points on a Sphere
It's a bit more subtle (the corresponding statement for circles is not correct).
kasdkashdkas··on Random Points on a Sphere
No, OP is correct; he spoke about an isotropic normal distribution (randn as opposed to rand).
kasdkashdkas··on Random Points on a Sphere
Since the box is anisotropic, this would not give the uniform distribution (it's more likely to draw a "diagonal" direction than a coordinate axis direction).
kasdkashdkas··on Random Points on a Sphere
They are only individually distributed uniformly in [-1,1], not jointly.
kasdkashdkas··on Random Points on a Sphere
Near the poles the surface becomes very flat and therefore there is as much surface area in a slice of constant height than anywhere else. Archimedes was a clever fella :-)