This one is my favourite metric<->imperial conversion.
1,024 karma · joined July 3, 2016
This one is my favourite metric<->imperial conversion.
Step 1) For mobile device to make a request to a special URL that is known to respond with short 200/204, something like that:
http://clients1.google.com/generate_204
http://captive.apple.com/hotspot-detect.html
http://www.msftconnecttest.com/connecttest.txt
...and bring up UI (sandboxed browser) if anything else than expected short 2xx was received.Step 2) Mobile device reuse same cookies for the same portal second time around, so portal can recognize returning user and let them in without annoying with login prompt each time.
Assuming mobile device has a separate cookie jar for this, and captive portal is HTTPS with proper certificate, and doesn't try to break other people's SSL, that is pretty secure. Sure, this is not the most efficient protocol, but up-side is - it's open-ended. You can fit here anything from "press here if you agree to behave" to complete walled garden like hotspot on a train that shows you interactive map, schedule and transport connections available on the next stop along with small banner asking $1 for full internet access.
That being said - that's a bit over the top. The only reason I wouldn't want my AP to be open and unfiltered is - I don't want any junk being sent out which is attributable to me (by IP), and which I have no control over. Iodine, being a tunnel will only transport to "guest"'s server and go into the wider Internet with their server's IP.
If somebody is in enough of a squezze to jump over that sort of hoops, and there're no costs/risks for me - let them have it. I'm fine with that.
Here's crazy idea: Why not run open network + IPSEC, or heck, even OpenVPN? Obviously, drop all non-VPN traffic right on the AP (or first router after it) to nip freeloaders in the bud.
Reminds me of:
https://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerabili...
In Swedish north, word for "yes" is pretty much shaped by what would be easiest sound to produce when one's lips are frozen:
Intel make most if its dies in US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_manufacturing_si...
- KPN has pretty much 100% country-wide 2G/3G coverage [1], so this is unlikely to be about long-reach aspect of LoRa;
- Frequency licenses are extremely expensive [2] and hard to obtain;
- KPN is silent about whether they use licensed or unlicensed spectrum for LoRa, apart from noting that frequency is "low" [3], while they didn't obtain any particularly low-freqency license recently [4]
Chances are this is just a land-grab for 433Mhz. [EDIT 868Mhz]
[1] http://www.sensorly.com/map/2G-3G/NL/Netherlands/KPN/gsm_204...
[2] https://www.telegeography.com/products/commsupdate/articles/...
[3] https://corporate.kpn.com/press/press-releases/kpns-new-lora...
[4] https://corporate.kpn.com/press/press-releases/kpn-obtains-h...
EDIT: Yep, they are going unlicensed, according to the site weitzj has pointed out: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/wiki/LoRaWAN-Frequencies