1,221 karma · joined March 4, 2014
https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-4-on-sale-now-...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rAITjrK39fiJYOT53ghq9DbC-e4...
If it's helpful for you, the code 'LIDLMUSIC' gives a free 6-month Tidal trial. It might be UK specific I have no idea.
I'm currently on a Tidal free trial but I won't be moving from Spotify when it's up. I personally can't tell the difference. Maybe I'm half deaf but ignorence is bliss.
> Not official; the numbers were estimated following a Steam API data leak in July 2018, which gave player ownership estimates for games on the platform that have achievements.
However, games like PUBG and Fortnite are free-to-play (PUBG is only free on mobile?) so in terms of actual sales, you could say GTA is more successful. Still not sure I'd class it as an "online shooter", though.
You've still got a load of wires to deal with though (unless you shell out for a fancy case).
Can you provide a source where "open hardware" was touted as an ideal for the Raspberry Pi Foundation.
It's a cheap education platform built on Broadcom hardware. I don't think there was ever much chance the Broadcom h/w was going to be open. And that's maybe sad for some people but it won't stop the Foundation achieving its actual goals. Open hardware enthusiasts can vote with their wallet, for all the impact it'll have. It must be one of the best selling novelty products of all time.
https://mobile.twitter.com/EbenUpton/status/1088440503622909...
I've personally no problem with them protecting their investment this way.
Edit: this looks like what I mean, just so happens to be github style but that's not a requirement! https://github.com/kogakure/gitweb-theme
I had this issue just last month with a UK financial institution (Raisin). I tried to explain it but they obviously were not interested. I actually still have my citizenship (I'd love to renounce but that's currently impossible) but I felt it was worth pointing out their policy was unnecessarily discriminative.
I had assumed there were 1000 instruction memory SRAMs in there but of course that'd be impossible considering the leakage numbers and there's actually just 12 x 64KB SRAMs shared by all the cores:
Per core
640 bytes (128x40-bit) local instruction memory
512 bytes (256x16-bit) local data memory
768 KB SRAM on-die
12 shared SRAM memory modules, 64 KB each
Those local per-core memories are tiny and presumably implemented with registers. But can you really do much with just 128 instructions? The following makes it sound like they might be instruction caches:> Instructions may come from the local instruction memory or they may be fetched from one of the independent memory module
But then goes onto say:
> the KiloCore's processors do not contain traditional caches.
Hopefully their paper has more info.
The survey that the "World’s First 1,000-Processor Chip" claim is based on (http://vcl.ece.ucdavis.edu/misc/many-core.html) doesn't seem to include any network processors, some of which are technically programmable. But even if it had, they wouldn't have found any of the information required for the table and definitely not a datasheet!
In theory I'd love a tool that could save me wasting my life on this every year. However, would I trust it? Not from a malicious standpoint but it seems there's been lots of changes over the last few years and I'd need to know the tool had been properly updated. To do that I'd have to go and read all the updates/instructions each year (just like I do now) and then also check the tool was correct. I'm not convinced a (free?) non-accountant DIY method helps when the monetary cost of it being outdated/bugged could be significant.
I guess you could argue that this is no different from any other open-source software and it's my choice to either personally audit it or assume someone else already has - including all the schedules I use. I'm struggling to understand why I have more of a concern with this compared to, for example, my web browser. Perhaps I am just especially (and irrationally??) fearful of the IRS and the consequence of getting taxes wrong.
$ apt install code
E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13: Permission denied)
E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend), are you root?https://semiengineering.com/chip-aging-becomes-design-proble...