Is the ~13 digit limitation due to the model itself (how/how well it was trained) or simply the use of double precision in the model weights (which maxes out around 15 digits of precision).
2,671 karma · joined September 1, 2021
https://github.com/kevinloch/
Is the ~13 digit limitation due to the model itself (how/how well it was trained) or simply the use of double precision in the model weights (which maxes out around 15 digits of precision).
This also applies to soldering/brazing copper pipes.
The 'n' in strncpy is mainly there to help you avoid overrunning the destination, it does not guarantee whatever makes in there is null-terminated.
This is why you should always explicitly set the last byte to zero after using strncpy (and never ever use strcpy).
char dest[16];
strncpy(dest, src, 15);
dest[15]=0;Gimp: Opens this image successfully without complaining. It takes a while and uses lots of swap space but it works.
OSX Preview App: "The file <filename> could not be opened. It may be damaged or use a file format that Preview doesn't recognize.
So not only does Preview fail to open the file, it also lies about what the specific issue is. Apparently nobody at Apple ever imagined opening such a large file.
The early Internet flourished in large part because the protocol designers correctly recognized that they couldn't predict or even imagine all the ways people would use their work. "Be conservative in what you send but liberal in what you accept - John Postel" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
Then there was that time in my Atari 800 was slashdotted. The Atari could serve several hits/s on it's 9600 baud interface but the 3com CS-210 terminal server would crash about every 6 hours. https://kl.net/atari/
Probably the most surprising (for it's time) hits/s I had to deal with was when Art Bell had my solar status monitor gif's inlined right on his homepage for a while in 1997-98. It was pretty wild when he would say on the air "Go to my website right now!"
Reminds me of comments when CD's came out int he 1980's. Audiophiles and magazine articles insisted they could "hear the aluminum".
What they were actually hearing was songs mastered for Vinyl or casette that had not been properly remastered for digital. Vinyl and casettes required pre-emphasis of highs to offset the limited high frequency response and noise of analog media.
I thought it was odd - and a bit misleading that it had the words "Digital Personal Communicator" on the box. I knew it couldn't communicate digitally but it did get me to imagine what that would be like.
I assume digital referred to the storage of phone numbers + names which was a novel feature at the time. The display wasn't seven segment LED like previous versions, it had low-res green dot matrix LED arrays that could display a few crude alphanumeric characeters.
Are they actually safer or do they just give the driver a false sense of security? Assuming it actually has 4WD/AWD (and most don't), that only helps you "go" and does nothing for "stop" as all cars have four wheel brakes.
One exception to this is being able to keep going in very rural areas where any rescue attempt would take too long. However, even this can fail with a false sense of security and poor judgement:
https://www.11alive.com/article/news/nation-world/man-strand...
> Of the dozens of missions we have had this winter involving a vehicle stuck in the snow, nearly all of them were 4x4 vehicles and almost all of the drivers told us, "I didn’t think I would get stuck."
I've found that EV's have a significant advantage in snow due to very precise torque control compared to an automatic or manual transmission. Even my Prius does surprisingly well in snow with fresh tires up to it's ~6" ground clearance.
This is exactly how an arbitrary group of scientists should react to extraordinary claims like this. Not 100% dismissal because of the history or provenance of the researchers, not 100% acceptance without independent replication.
It also helps reduce fraudulent claims of new discoveries.
Seriously though, until very recently you could hear dot matrix printers at most airline gates. They used them to print out manifests to hand to the crew right before the plane departs.
GeoSky frequently lets youtubers film in the cockpit of their 747-200's. If you are a fan of the classic 747 steam gauge cockpits, these videos are priceless. Some examples:
Classic Boeing 747-200 Clock Shop! Geo Sky Takeoff from Tbilisi, Georgia, to Frankfurt! https://youtu.be/JSKYoqVPtWw?t=88
BOEING 747-200 Takeoff | Less than 10 B747 Classic still flying now! https://youtu.be/O8AA_tkY49g?t=503
That means if you could see it, it would also be as white hot as the Sun seen from Space.
Option 1: Do more research on Gravity to see what we might be missing there. The difficulty in measuring G, and the flyby anomaly would be good places to start.
Option 2: Make up fully unconstrained variable 'X' that can take any value you want at any location or time in the universe[1]. This is amazing because it can perfectly solve so many difficult problems!
Obviously many people will and should be skeptical of throwing full confidence at option 2 in it's current state.
[1] Unlike neutrinos or black holes, there is no theory for what dark matter is made of, and how it is created or destroyed. Thus there are no constraints on how much you can have at any given location or time.
Could you add links to play songs on Spotify?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931
Human color vision is a lot more complicated than it seems at first. The sensitivity curves of the actual receptors in the eye do not directly match our physiological perception curves for red, green, and blue. The red perception curve even has some negative (!) values. There is a lot of neurological processing involved and that is why colorspace models are so complicated and imperfect. There is no simple absolute "RGB" mapping like I and many others have naively assumed before digging into it.
There was an arrangement where the older neighborhood kids would look after the younger ones.
There were some unusually significant structural differences between the prototype dash 80 and production 707's, for example:
> The 132 in (3,400 mm) wide fuselage of the Dash 80 was large enough for four-abreast (two-plus-two) seating like the Stratocruiser. Answering customers' demands and under Douglas competition, Boeing soon realized this would not provide a viable payload, so it widened the fuselage to 144 in (3,660 mm) to allow five-abreast seating and use of the KC-135's tooling.
From this it sounds like they might have changed the primary loopback IP, which by default is the "router-id" for various routing protocols, causing the entire network to have to reconverge. You can override the default router-id with an explicit address that does not depend on lo0 but lots of networks don't do that.
It's extremely uncommon to change the primary loopback address. It's less uncommon to add an additional one but as the article says that syntax varies by vendor: Juniper will add as additional by default, Cisco and Arista will replace the existing primary one (IPv4) unless you include the "secondary" keyword...
For example a one year non-compete after separation might be unreasonable by itself, but coupled with one year of full severance pay is a different story, although there is still the "what am I supposed to do with my time?" issue.
If you are a founder/early employee with significant equity then a non-compete clause when being acquired will likely be acceptable to you.
The sensitivity curves of Kodachrome 64 and presumably 35mm film stock much more closely match CIE 1931 effective bandpass curves and results in much more accurate color.
However, most this can easily be fixed in post with modern tools. Almost all of what you are seeing today is artifacts of the Director/cinematographer/editor's artistic choices and not the acquisition tech.
Before Covid this was definitely true. However, since early 2020 there has been a significant trend of people turning their cameras on during conference calls. And not just for work, my local AFOL club has weekly zoom meetings where most participants use video. Family members will sometimes do a group video chat on FB.
I likely participate in more video calls per week than sci-fi writers and scientists of the 1960's imagined, mainly because the incremental cost today is zero (we pay for it whether we use it or not).
> people now prefer to communicate solely by text message, so we're effectively going back to something like a fancy telegraph.
While true, I don't think that makes video calls an irrelevant novelty.