klysm

Batteries are amazing for covering ancillary services. Once that market saturates, they move into arb. CAISO is also a capacity market, so you get paid for simply existing

I’ll believe them when they put the lethal trifecta with their own skin in the game

I don’t agree with the advice that it should be a public facing ID - that depends on the application

This is funny because I regularly run into Claude claiming it is fatigued

Run more agents!

It isn’t, but the whole night thing is a bit of a problem and storage isn’t there yet at grid scale, but it’s coming.

Thankfully this is one of the easiest limitations to get around technically. Grid forming inverters and inertia markets make this pretty straightforward to solve IMO. Storage is the key thing we need to solve

Nothing competes with JLC but circuit hub isn’t terrible

This and sheet metal manufacturing from Oshcut have been game changers for me

Not true, you can make the R G and B points far enough out to capture the entire human gamut

Maybe they wired up a agent to file lawsuits

I always leave a 0 ohm DNP on any TX/RX line.

I’ve been working with MIP solvers a lot at work recently, and the depth of black magic is so deep it’s hard to comprehend. Even after the presolve there are so many tradeoffs and structures to exploit it’s hard to understand the whole system

I’ll believe this when I see it on GitHub - rooting for them

I agree with your premise, but I think it’s also important to reconcile this with the idea that nothing is simple. Everything that’s made is usually much more complex than it appears in the surface

I just use Debian these days

ERCOT operates under a “connect and manage” interconnection philosophy. This means things can actually get built quickly (unlike other ISOs), but some management is required.

Of course, there are some downsides to this approach, but overall I think it’s a superior. Just look at renewable and battery penetration compared to other ISOs.

Indexes?

What kind of throughput are we talking about?

Maybe the technical requirements at the time were a good excuse but as soon as you demonstrate the market will tolerate that why on earth would you remove it?

Damnit I was really rooting for uv :(

I hate everything about XML. I have lost weeks of my life to fixing whitespace sensitive bugs

Yes but think of the shareholders! And that doesn’t show up nicely on a spreadsheet does it?

Bravo to the designers of this library. It’s well implemented and I’ve been using the poly fill for years now

I’m not seeing HVDC tech on the interconnection queue. The baseline power problem isn’t going away any time soon.

Nuclear just doesn’t go on standby, that’s the point.

Grids need reliability. Battery tech is not close to providing long enough durations to fulfill load with just renewables. I would much rather have nukes than natural gas filling that role.

I expect this kind of counter signaling to become more common in the coming years.

Little too lexically close to girth

Seems like a good way to materialize the conflict.

Quick submit a level 10 CVE DOS vuln!