It can be even more lines as long as the hunks are continuous. Once you lose the context of change and have to “zoom out” to see where it fits in, the review time grows significantly.
38,263 karma · joined December 12, 2014
Please forward all complaints to hn dot username at the big G's electronic letter service.
> Don't be curmudgeonly. Thoughtful criticism is fine, but please don't be rigidly or generically negative.
Seriously. How often do we get a story that intersects power generation and volcanos?
I read, or at least lightly skim through, the article I post about. But always post whatever comes to mind, regardless of how it will come across.
> Nvidia did not announce a price for the system, but analysts say a single Vera Rubin rack can cost more than $7 million.
So around $50 million in one shipping container. I bet they put more than an air tag to track those on the move.
Vegetables are delicious on their own. There’s thousands of years of cultures around the world making vegetables taste wonderful.
Where does that put someone calling out a public hit? It is just words after all.
> I could care less if someone wants to say they're going to hurt me. My beef is when they actually try to do it.
They say there’s no atheists in foxholes.
Is it really that unusual to contact a large tech company and not get a response for (egad!) 90 minutes?
I don’t get it. Isn’t the golang version already native?
Or is this one of those things where it’s not supposed to make sense?
Why would he be watching the Bruins and not the Devils?
> None required once automated review and security checks are green
How anybody can let an LLM write docs and not even read them is pure insanity.
The dentist suggested pulling out the tooth first and then doing an x-ray?
It does, but only urban renting. It doesn’t measure increases in housing costs for suburbs directly. In particular it does not track increases in home values or mortgage payments for new buyers based on current rates.
But horizontal tabs are still better. Not technically better or ascetically better. Some other immeasurable, indescribable better.
Make privacy at the enterprise level the first class feature.
Too bad people won’t pay for any of this.
Otherwise could run two passes to get down to .25% or three passes to .0125%. Or four passes to .000625%!
That’d be .02 seconds of error per hour!
Indeed. But until that time, if we are going to do it, better it be done in a way that will clearly succeed.
Unless you’re this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wenceslao_Moguel
Really? I can’t be the only one that will spend hours reading this kind of stuff. You guys don’t read man pages for fun?
In Canada for instance, I’ve seen towns where they have pick up once every two weeks and the canister is not even a full size one. It’s a “gentle” push to get people to recycle and compost.
No way that would fly in Freedom Town USA.
Former head of the CIA, David Petreaus, was using the drafts folder of a shared Gmail account to communicate with his mistress.
Otherwise you can get a python one liner that execs a different script engine.
What gloves? For 110V? Bah!
Unless you’re a complete idiot and try to cut both wires at once with a conductive cutter, nothing happens when you snip them one by one.
And selection bias means we don’t see those guys around for long.
There’s no reason for the majority of them to have an infinite budget cap. Prod? Sure. UAT? Why not. The sandbox environment Johnny just spun up to test some new agentic workflow? Hell no.
Even if you can’t, if you put enough of them by stop signs and traffic lights it’s a non-issue.
Interesting choice for his favorite rooftop 12m in!
> For the U.S., because sanctioning an “unpleasant”, but in essence harmless individual (geopolitically speaking) is ridiculous. Falling victim to de-banking alone can really ruin one’s life.
Not a good look sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s effective over the near term. Especially if they keep expanding this to include more of the ICC bench.
That’s the whole point of such sanctions anyway. It might feel different because it’s a Canadian judge and not a Russian oligarch. But at the core the USA wants to put pressure on something and the means is indirectly applied to an individual.