ksm1717

Yea its obviously valid.. you think the dude just bossed up and made a daw for this crazy hostile build target without knowing how people use them?

I took it personally because all these hacker news retards want to nitpick a hobby project when a post like this (really cool, non-axios.com-tech-guy-libertarian-shit) shows up to feel like they have a big dick despite not being able to build something half as cool themselves

Yea I’m mocking you because if you couldn’t tell how annoying your obvious “constructive” criticism was going to sound, you’ve got some significant barriers to overcome

Yea what an idiot to not make this free proof of concept of a browser daw targeted at 20+ years power users

I promise you that California is not entrenched with anyone remotely far to the left

I have a hunch that this concern can be alleviated with proven usage and broader community acceptance

A drivers license and a degree.. who would have thought of those

Lots of really cogent points. Hopefully he reads this comment and swiftly begins working on designing a Diplomatic Agent to avoid the MAD or getting a good peace treaty

I was interested until I learned that the application is blazingly fast :/

So copyrightable is 2 char?

Agree

What if it’s 10 characters?

What if it’s one character?

Yes because then it means you associated with the wrong people and you are destined to be miserable

(See my response to the sibling of this comment)

Hi, my apologies, just got to your message. Implicit was my assumption that cars will be outlawed ~10 years from now, meaning we have every car that we need today. “Grandfather” was shorthand for “grandfathered in”

This changes the game for me. Well done.

Idk I drive my grandfathers old car and I think most people have at least 2 grandfathers

buying a new car is generally antithetical to buying a sustainable car

Ah, maybe it’s just my opinion that a car need not be more than a silent torque machine..

Glad that you mostly agree with my statement.. if the regulators weren’t dragging their feet we could have this “platform” as an industry standard.. Ford f1-volty (:

Exactly my point! It’s a shame that the bolt (a car of indiscriminate quality) has been so named as to cause this confusion with the volt, (a car of discriminate quality).

That’s my point, why bother with Bolt et al. when the volt has already established as a clear front runner.

Yes but consider a non homeowners situation. How much would one have to pay for a parking permit? Add on to this the cost of switching registration (as is necessary in Cambridge, MA to get an on street permit). Model Y is untenable unless you’re making Draper cash! Volt on the other hand…

Eyes on the ball. Bolt is a beat car. We are talking Volt and Tesla. I agree with your sentiment regardless

Sell the other car

Edit: or get a rubber car to counteract

Price and panel gaps

The Chevy volt model as established in the early 2010s is an arm and a leg beyond the next closest competitor in the electric automobile space and this is a smirch upon its namespace

“Conspiracy theory” has such intense negative connotation that “conspiracy” alone is corrupted

Never attribute credence to an argument because it has a name

Obviously they are saying that yes.