Assuming you are not being sarcastic, I would expect actually the opposite.
65 karma · joined October 11, 2020
Assuming you are not being sarcastic, I would expect actually the opposite.
In all honesty, would you hold that argument if Mexico decides to host Russian or Chinese troops?
As long as is not C++...
Why there aren't any coup d'etats in the US?
Because in the US there isn't embassy of the US.
As if is not stealing if you are a druggie or homeless.
This. For average programmers like myself, latest and fanciest language features are of little value. C++ and (unfortunately) D are in the same quest: to incorporate every programing language paradigm available, the extra complexity be damned. In the specific case of D, I'd rather have a good assortment of native D libraries than more bells and whistles added to the language.
Fortunately, we have "Helter Skelter".
Says the bully.
Did you also run tests against other libraries such as glib?
The author is writing specfically about software engineering but by by-passing the 'software' word in the title he is making a disservice to the real engineers (those professionals who have to go through a rather demanding set of requirements to be considered as such, e.g. mechanical, structural, chemical, etc).
We software developers love to be called engineers because it give us gravitas and status. But we fool ourselves and, most importantly the public, as our field is not regulated and it doesn't have a clear mandate nor ethical rules as the registered engineers.
Julia's overenthusiastic posts here in HN make me wary of the language instead of curious.
Yes, this is true, but a lot of this poor understanding can be tracked down to the over-enthusiasm (and straight overselling speak, mind you) of most of the AI scientists.
The company I work for (mining) hired a top-notch AI guy to "change the fundaments of data management and processing in the company, using the latest AI technology". Guy left six months later... I still wonder why he lasted that long.
I understand C++ is messy because, back in the day, Stroustrup never say no to a request or suggestion from a potential user. He wanted his language to be widely used. Guess he succeeded.