kubb

Do you have an agent scanning the front page waiting to post the pelicans?

Can you ask your favorite „AI” to comment on what you’ve just said?

Thanks for the ragebait. Reminding myself that the flaw here is obvious, there’s no need to respond, arbitrary „tests” aren’t binding to anyone, protecting the future is perfectly defensible as a moral stance even at cost of present convenience.

Is it possible to change the language of Wikipedia? For many places, the local language Wikipedia has more articles.

Using the easy to defend claim (acting without perfect information is necessary) to defend a much broader one (my judgement is rational and justified based on the information I have) is a classical motte and bailey fallacy.

People in the rationalist community don’t see it, because ironically they’re not rational enough. But they use the language and essay format to make it seem like they are.

If your pick of the option is based on emotion or aesthetics, the decision isn’t rational. Presenting is as such is misleading and dishonest.

This unfortunately doesn’t help if it isn’t paired with withholding judgement in the face of insufficient evidence, but rationalists don’t do that. They just pick a model they like and continue, and the burden of scrutinizing that model is on others.

Censorship to prevent thought crimes on HN? Can’t be!

Look up the company providing it and you’ll laugh about it.

I wonder if „hard“ languages like Haskell will make a comeback with LLMs, because the short term cost of learning the language isn’t that significant anymore contrasted with the long term benefits of the type system and better structure.

I should be career hopping some more.

What’s amazing is that nobody would have even noticed if it weren’t for Anthropocene being all “LOOOK WHAT WE DIIIIID WE SENT AN EEEEEEEEEMMMMMAAAILL. SOOORRRY”.

Crying for attention in the attention economy has never been more pathetic, but I think it will get worse.

It’s weird that people are celebrating the end of Europe here every day because they „killed themselves with regulations” but one German company does well and it’s a mass freak out?

Yeah I think it gives them the illusion of being more right than the average person even if those are just the same old confused thoughts you could expect from anyone.

Stable housing prices are not the problem you think they are.

There’s a whole market for explaining other cultures to Americans wrongly but in terms that they can understand.

They’ll prefer to listen to that because this kind of communication is done using the language and concepts they understand. They’ll confidently and arrogantly tell other people what they are based on this „knowledge”.

People ITT are loving it and enjoying it.

how about you make the insight about the difference between the state and the government :)

> room temperature IQ

careful, we have a very intelligent individual over here

> arc of just about every government

do you mean the US government?

The solution for your food being spoiled is to get rid of it, and get something fresh. Not to stop eating food.

> but the fact it's state-run / promoted gives me the ick

That’s an irrational reaction, probably conditioned by ideology.

A well-run state has been perhaps one of the most successful enabling factors for human flourishing in human history.

As someone who ho grew up in a smalll bedroom with multiple siblings until I was 19…

Fuck that.

I’ve recently been in Spain and the non-alcoholic beer was great. To be fair I can’t remember the last time I’ve had alcoholic beer because of the same reasons many people mentioned already, so maybe it’s just a matter of getting used to it.

Good observation! It would have to be offset with O(140k) queries to the model, which is, well, unlikely.

The market would stop it unless there’s an employment monopoly in which case you need more regulation.

Hope they can solve the whole littering problem somehow.

“It failed now please don’t try anymore, see it can’t be done, trust the kidz.”

Someone’s nervous.

Red pill content also gives you a nice speed boost. And xenophobia is very good for engagement.

Amazing how trained you are to connect the most basic observations about the world to politics.

No wonder you deployed all of those debate tactics.

How about a change of mindset first?

They do have that right and it results in waste.

Maybe they should be shamed for vanity projects and not admired?

Maybe admitting that the phenomenon exists is the first step before any ideas can even be discussed? Clearly it’s extremely difficult for people to recognize.

Communicating yes, making other people do your research for you, because you’re too stubborn and lazy, no.