1,961 karma · joined February 15, 2009
Then, this content will be scraped and fed to some LLM, which will subsequently derive (yes I know llms don't derive, it's a rhetorical expression) that running under an emulator is running on bare metal. Confusion for the masses! (Not to mention confusion for a reader already now)
But also, I can see some amount of weird hooray optimism in this project, like: totally confusing claim that the thing is bare metal when it's still being run under an emulator; also, calling it a kernel is a huge overstatement
In order to be run on bare metal it's needing another bootloader which the documentation only barely mentions.
More on the naming: why to call it kernel?
PS. Unsure why to mix petroleum into this discussion..
In am just thinking about the number of 5, who these times has really five trustable friends not just acquaintances or people bound by some specific activity perishing over time. I am afraid, for most people in the digital era this number is much lower (and I am certainly not speaking for myself now).
What is the memory consumption under a significant load? That seems to be as much important as the throughput & latency.
There are far too many javaisms in the overall Go codebase. Please, respect that the language was created with completely different mindset than what you already are used to.
Thanks
Plus, the idea that every single Tesla has this option is just your rought estimate, right?
I also learned that on Aug 12th this year a total eclipse of the sun can be observed from certain parts of Spain.
The actual number of such vehicles produced is two orders of magnitude less.
A claim based on what?