kvthweatt

This is my point. You could go check it out.

Seems like every time I ask nicely nothing happens.

Also this is not "switch to my language" it's please provide feedback.

hmm looks like there's actually something to interact with this time around.

This is implying I must spend my time here and be your friend just to get feedback.

I have other places to be and other things to do. I don't come here to read up, I come here to share. Some come to read up. Some come to comment and provide feedback.

I'm too busy spending my time developing my language with no one asking questions for me to answer.

zero copy structs? no?

not even if i said it was real and verifiable? no?

fuck it right fuck my work.

Can now do:

```

#import "standard.fx";

using standard::io::console;

def main() -> int

{

    i16 x = 0b1011010011110100;

    data{6} as u6;

    u6 y = x[0``5];

    if (y in x)

    {

        println("Success!");

    };

    return 0;

};

```

Over the last month I've done an insane amount of work, and the compiler has matured enough I can safely start expanding the standard library. As of today we now have a minimal crypto library with SHA256, AES-128 (FIPS 197 compliant!), and MD5 to start.

There are plenty of working examples to try along with tests.

Note that only x86_64 is supported currently and I'm working to support more architectures, as well as provide better support for Darwin.

If anyone finds the language interesting and would like to help, I could really use testers for different operating systems and architectures so I can add ABI-specific stuff to the standard library to extend support.

tl;dr we now have basic IO (console,file,sockets) and basic cryptography. I built this language in approximately 9 months also.

Give it a shot and tell me what you think of it.

Currently in the pre-bootstrap phase, the reduced specification is almost fully implemented.

While missing some parts still, you can write Turing-complete programs, mainly because you have the ability to write inline ASM.

Added the ability to auto unredact and generate HTML from your PDF files.

My point being if it is properly and truly unredacted, then it's the truth.

The CYA is just me saying I'm not responsible for anything anyone makes, because anyone can make a document say anything with this tool.

I fixed all the issues in the tool.

It works now.

Just fixed it, try it again.

Added images to show the tool in action.

Well what are they gonna do tell me take the tool down? Too late.

New info dropped:

The redactions by DOJ are so sloppy that you can COPY AND PASTE blocks of text to a new text editor and see the "redacted" text beneath.

Try it yourself.

They did not properly redact many documents.

It's about to get wild.

Precisely. The tool is neutral.

You do you but I advise you don't.

Standard CYA procedure

For all we know, Epstein could have punished Trump and made him write "I'm a little bitch boy" 2,000 times and it took up 119 pages so every line got redacted. /madlibs

This just attempts to match box dimensions.

That's the point though. You cannot just write anything and put it up.

It must be accurate. Even that being said, you still shouldn't reupload your altered document anywhere.

Either way, fixed or with index lines.

Yes.

The point is you can perform a box dimension attack.

If you have a known input, you can match all outputs.

Example: Document that DOJ took down and reuploaded that redacted Trump's name when it was previously available. They used the same size boxes in each location.

You cannot do this with handwriting, but fonts have known widths.

Fucking tired of this pedophile infested control ring wrapped around our necks.

It's time we just fix the files ourselves since we're not getting the truth.

DOJ deleted a doc with Trump's name in it, reuploaded with redaction OVER HIS NAME.

Fucking morons didn't vary the box dimensions and have been very sloppy the whole time so I think we can safely assume some boxes with specific dimensions are Trump. If we can cross-reference and verify with each other, we may be able to rebuild documents together.

Tired of this shit.

AI definitely does take time before spitting out a response. You’re just a slow moving human and it’s a machine that can think through multiple different essays before the signal to blink goes from your brain to your eyes. But congrats on making your own chat bot. Happy for you.

Fix the web interface to not be so slow. On older laptops other AI models run fine. Claude seems to be running locally, and I see no discussion of this.

It’s working. I’m checking it out now.

Spoke too early, wrote a tool to check what codegen methods were present and it lied to me.

As of a few hours ago, all LLVM codegen methods have been implemented for the base language!

There are still issues here and there, namely with parsing.

Anyone can begin writing Flux programs and compile them.

I’m getting 502 on mobile

It’s getting very close. I’m currently implementing the reduced specification to get the base language. After that, depending on how much help I get, I may implement more before bootstrapping.

Not gonna lie tho I don’t know shit about compiler theory but seeing how LLVM works I think I can do it.

tl;dr it’s what C++ should have been change my mind