Is this a sign that Apple might be preparing to kill the Apple TV box? Perhaps they see the future as being native smart apps inbuilt into the TV.
1,373 karma · joined May 16, 2011
it appears like the only differences between YubiKey 4 and Yubikey 5 NFC is i) the addition of NFC and ii) the addition of FIDO 2 support
The differences between Yubikey NEO and YubiKey 5 NFC appear to be i) The addition of docker login support (?!); ii) FIDO 2; iii) RSA 4096 (PGP) support and iv) ECC p384 (not in PGP) support.
With that in mind.... how widely is FIDO2 deployed? I haven't yet found a two factor app supporting app/site that doesn't support my Yubikey 4.
(My website may not survive the HN hug of death).
—-
I made this because I feel there’s some interesting questions and implications this raises specifically because it’s going after unauthorised sellers who market their goods as new.
I specifically did not try to answer all the questions I’ve raised because for most of them I don’t have a definitive answer, or possibly even what it should be. I’m interested to see discussion on these points though!
>You can also Favourite a Toot. Which basically means that you support or agree with a Toot.
Are favourites toots private? Can someone else view them? Are they automatically shown up in timelines (as liked tweets do).
Also, does favourite really imply agreement? To me atleast, I favourited tweets that I didn’t agree with just because they pointed to a well constructed argument, or for future reference.
Since twitter changed terminology to like I’ve stopped doing that.
>Price says that prior to being fired, the company had never discussed her social media presence with her or issued a warning for anything she had posted. “If it was covered in orientation, I wouldn’t know. I got pulled out of orientation to jump into rebreaking the story arc for this season of Living World.”
I do not want to opt-in, instead I want it to stop asking me to opt in.
http://www.infinityplus.co.uk/stories/blit.htm
That’s the first one, others are available online too.
FakeUnicode [0] claims that setting it in an Wifi SSID is enough.
I can personally attest that my iPhone is currently stuck at the lock screen, crashing back to that when I enter my pin; after receiving the character in a Twitter DM (causing an iOS notification).
[0] https://twitter.com/FakeUnicode/status/963335318601531392
For completeness, GPLv3 has the following option available:
>c) Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the written offer to provide the Corresponding Source. This alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord with subsection 6b.
Whilst the equivilent in v2 ( https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html ) is
> b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, [next clause]
Which is a lot less restrictive over when you can use the written offer approach.
As it stands the developers don’t appear to have actively refused to provide source code - it might be premature to call them out for breaking the terms of the license.
Edit: My interpretation above appears to be correct in so far as you don’t have to make the source code proactively available (unlike what Video LANs President claimed in the article)
>Moreover, they don’t seem to share the source at all, which is also a violation.”
But there is still the requirement to include the license to inform the user of their rights. Unfortunately the article doesn’t seem to explicitly say whether there’s a licensee tucked into eg the About screen from the screenshot.
IANAL but assuming there is, then the developers here could still be in the clear?
>a person with extensive or specialised knowledge about a subject; an expert.
As in, 'Joe is the authority on the history of computers'
Given that's the first example I'm not sure it's worth continuing to read.
I cannot reproduce 234 though.
Which is a) very wordy. B) appears to essentially say “only certain kinds of groups are welcome”. C) doesn’t have a simple way of doing so instead being “reach out and discuss with us and then maybe we’ll let you set up shop here”
Sad to see their VR work go unfunded now though. There have been several opinions voiced recently that VR is effectively dead; I think it's just that we don't really know how to use it best yet - and this group was one of the only groups I was aware of taking a full head-first jump into figuring out what can work in VR
I think that makes you much better than an 'ok' player!
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_College_of_Pediatrici...