Not bored. They're looking to make their numbers to justify the next budgeting plan with the city.
342 karma · joined January 30, 2017
It seems that emitting light when eaten is a final defense to attract the attention of your consumer's predators to protect others members of your species from a similar fate.
It's a lie. It tricks the reader looking for deeper meaning.
Though hastily chosen non-AI images may do this too.
An exposed, spinning shaft seems benign but once it wraps you or your clothing around the shaft it pulls you in and destroys you in a flash.
Pedantic, but chance of miss is actually less than 14% more likely since the user's click location is not uniformly random over the thickness area, it's biased toward the center (normally distributed).
Has a graph query capability which is like a reasoning engine. And beyond that, can run simulations on the models.
Multi user, version control with branch and merge, time shifting, etc.
It's for diagramming whole environments, not just discrete diagrams.
Some of our best users are professional consultants who use us for a project which often introduces us to a new customer.
A Show HN would certainly be in order. Thanks for the thoughts!
https://schematix.com/video/depmap
I'm the founder. It's a tool for interacting with deployment diagrams like you mentioned in your article.
We have customers who also model state machines and generate code from the diagrams.
If they get results from a test, but without the compelling observation, they're then operating outside their well established statistical framework, and they can't confidently evaluate the meaningfulness of the test results.
To me, this doesn't mean the extra information is bad, or unhelpful, it's just they are not yet properly calibrated to use it properly.
I've heard this sentiment from medical professionals before and this was my conclusion.