Failed state immigrants will kindly remind you that what you really need is a Backup Country, you just don't know it yet.
70 karma · joined September 24, 2010
apologies for any hasty misunderstandings and late replies in advance.
Failed state immigrants will kindly remind you that what you really need is a Backup Country, you just don't know it yet.
This guy and the person that quit the bullshit industrial complex 6 months ago should get together and launch a startup.
Better yet, we should all go and join Jeremy Howard's answer.ai pro bono. Besides being miraculously headed by a guy who is Not An Asshole, it incidentally also had the most refreshing launch post (in the warm and fuzzy way) this side of the AI bubble.
The launch post concluded with this heading:We Don’t Really Know What We’re Doing.[0]
I mean, for the finest minds in our respective fields, what else is there left to say really?
Also thought it was amusing that there's a gym and sauna installed but one is only allowed a 2 minute shower per week.
If he wanted to only offload $8B TSLA stock and not buy the company, why put that possibility way more out of reach by waiving due dilligence and accepting the special performance clause?
Are we also to assume that he has managed to assemble the most abjectly incompetent team of lawyers in the world as well?
Charlie Kaufman's Bafta Lecture https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRfXcWT_oFs
Gabor Mate, Prisoners of Childhood https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9B5mYfBPlY
I consider Bret Victor's inventing on principle a non-technical talk, so yeah that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII
Quel Solaar, on creativity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJmqaWq7PJY
What Elon is pushing for seems...no different than what Germany has been doing for at least two weeks? If I’m to understand, people are saying they’re gonna cancel their orders because the company is arguing for a response that is in line with a country (even praised by the American media[0]) that has done a decent job with its pandemic response? This doesn’t seem to be the hill to die on just yet.
Reminds me—not being from there—I’m always amazed how warm southern California is in the winter compared to say, many parts of the mediterranean. I mean Los Angeles in January is warmer than Tehran. Too bad the factory isn’t down there.
The play should be to avoid a shutdown when the second wave hits, no? You look at the warm far eastern asian countries: Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia. They have a combined population of 580 million with less than 2000 combined deaths. 7 times the population of Germany with a fourth of the deaths of Germany. If they had four times the deaths it would still be impressive, considering they’re mostly dealing with it with less healthcare infrastructure.
I do think warmer places would fair better when the second wave hits in the fall. Southern California would be better for a factory. But Texas in that regard would work as well.
[0] https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/04/an...
Sometimes you need to throw the baby out with the bathwater in order to realize that the baby was never in the bathtub, that it had left the bathtub a long time ago.
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FCLkZKIJF4&feature=youtu.be...
The article you link to seems kind of overkill at times. It links to his articles for evidence of racial slurs where it seems pretty obvious he's doing it intentionally since in one he mentions an uproar where Sarah Silverman called Chinese people Chinks ("People look really stupid shaking their fists at a clown"), however self-serving that may be.
But I think it can be said that his arguments are often repeat ad-nauseam versions of this scene from Rescue Me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJpziU7wSs
[1] very NSFW http://old.noob.us/humor/what-if-women-were-as-horny-as-men-...
[2] http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/boys-wil...
You can be silly and be authentic most of the time, and then once in a while when you say something about the truth, people will listen.
I love that line in Ghostbusters: ""Let's say this Twinkie represents the normal amount of psychokinetic energy in the New York area."[1] It stupid and silly, hell its Ghostbusters, but the scene is an authentic template of many idiotic and funny explanations you witness in random casual conversation, as well as being pretty much a template for all latter day Bill Murray scenes.
McInnes' view on writing--"just write a letter to your brother but take out all the inside jokes"--has been almost completely abandoned in the magazine.
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzaQjS1JstY
EDIT: typo
Also is it realistic to require programmers to wear business casual at a top notch cybersecurity firm? Is this an actual thing?
edit: typo
https://medium.com/message/networks-without-networks-7644933...
So just so I get this right: When they say "Encourage diversity in the workplace" do they mean "all things being equal, hire the women", or do they mean "all things being not immensely unequal, hire the women"?
Seriously, it's marketing snake oil and its creating wasteful barriers to entry for companies thinking of creating innovative user-friendly government software. And it can't die fast enough. I know its probably not high on this dean's priority list, but if I were a CMU student I'd be embarrassed that my university was associated a pseudo-serious institution that makes claims vastly exceeding what the scientific method can conclude given the data they present. The gap between their projected air of authority and their obliviousness to the limits of their methodology should make any engineer-oriented person uneasy. Yes there are probably some smart people in the SEI with interesting war stories and such but the whole certification thing has got to go.
Most of you in start-ups probably never heard of CMMI. This is generally a good thing.
er, what? The agile push came from people who saw an opportunity to make money [1].
There are only four items in the Agile Manifesto. The second item specifically highlights documentation cost overhead of traditional methods as a major grievance: "Working software over comprehensive documentation" (see also [1]). I don't think money is a differentiating factor, we're talking about the software business in the end after all. If you're referring to process snakeoil marketing, I'm against that no matter which side is doing it. I was responding to your assertion that software developers go from "agile" to "design up front" as they "grow up". My view is that the people that began popularizing the agile term were in fact "grown up" programmers. Are we talking about different things when we talk about design? What is the output of "design up front" in the traditional sense if not documentation and diagrams? (for example, see the military standards and ISO standards for what's required for detailed design)
I don't see anything objectionable in the descriptions you give, although I don't view the waterfall process as being predictable in any meaningful sense. Its only predictable in so far as its underlying assumptions hold. And in the software world at large such assumptions (fixed unchanging requirements for example) rarely hold. My claim is that circumstances for the space shuttle software is the exception, not the rule.
Lets see:
* 35 million dollar budget a year.
* developing software that only has "one job", regardless of how hard that job is.
* In other words, no evolving software to meet the demands of an evolving world. Fixed requirements 'forever' (as much as forever can be in software terms). No one at NASA is going "hey, I know we developed this for earth orbit but lets alter the design and try use 90% of the same code to go to the moon as well earth orbit. We'll save time and money." (Unlike SpaceX to some extent)
* irreversible decisions. safety critical etc.
* Due to lavish budget and safety critical risks, reduced schedule pressure. No one wants to be on the other end of a independent report concluding that long hours resulted in sloppy code that got astronauts killed.
The above often even doesn't apply to most relatively expensive (in the millions) non-safety critical military and government software. Watch the Pentagon Wars for a hilarious illustration that comes closer to the reality that software engineers face in those environments.
Its a scandal that space shuttle software is being used to push pseudo-scientific process ideology. Its often claimed that SEI developed CMMI process using the space shutte software process as a blueprint. CGI Federal was CMMI Level 5 on paper and QSSI was CMMI Level 3. Meaning that the companies responsible for the most public software scandal in recent US history that is healthcare.gov wasted something like $300 mil at t0 writing the "wrong stuff" while claiming to do it "the right way".
Enforcing abstract processes instead of dealing with case-to-case facts reminds me of this quote:
"We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield." --George Orwell
Contrast all this with Elon Musk's thoughts on Process:
"Now I have to tell you something, and I mean this in the best and most inoffensive way possible: I don’t believe in process. In fact, when I interview a potential employee and he or she says that “it’s all about the process,” I see that as a bad sign.The problem is that at a lot of big companies, process becomes a substitute for thinking. You’re encouraged to behave like a little gear in a complex machine. Frankly, it allows you to keep people who aren’t that smart, who aren’t that creative."
>when agile developers/hackers/programmers grow up they end up doing design up front.
er, what? The agile push came people who were reacting against creating pages of useless design up front documentation that was Dead On Arrival as soon as it was written. People in general become more capable in design up front as their knowledge of the domain grows, but that too depends on context. I'm not sure how valuable design up front would be to even an experienced software engineer who is faced with a project in a programming language he hasn't worked with and a customer domain and platform he doesn't know....
related, SpaceX Lessons Learned: http://lwn.net/Articles/540368/