HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

loeg

27,250 karma · joined October 24, 2011

submissionscomments
loeg··on On caring for user data: NeoVim caused Vim undo files to be deleted
If you ignore it, do you continue allowing edits to the file? Now undo history is corrupt and useless anyway. Or do you disallow editing until the user manually deletes some hidden, implementation-detail file for a feature they probably never use?
loeg··on On caring for user data: NeoVim caused Vim undo files to be deleted
Keep in mind NeoVim forked in 2014, too.
loeg··on On caring for user data: NeoVim caused Vim undo files to be deleted
It was a real problem, but as GP already mentioned, Vim has integrated some version of it since Vim 8 (2016), probably at least somewhat motivated by NeoVim (forked 2014).

https://lwn.net/Articles/713114/

loeg··on On caring for user data: NeoVim caused Vim undo files to be deleted
It was ostensibly necessary for other, arguably more important features. Persistent undo maybe just isn't that important? I certainly don't use it nearly as much as the author seems to.
loeg··on Does Georgism work? Five years later
It's just one local revenue stream, comparable to property tax. Nothing about it requires or precludes any other policy goal like making cities "nice" places to live.
loeg··on Does Georgism work? Five years later
I don't even think "unused" is helpful framing. I'd say, property taxes should be assessed on land, not productive imps. If you want to keep your expensive urban downtown land a parking lot, fine, but it shouldn't be subsidized by lower taxes than your neighbor with a high-rise.
loeg··on Does Georgism work? Five years later
LVT is assessed on land value. Your 13 rural acres aren't insanely valuable and would not be assessed a million dollars a year under a Georgian model.
loeg··on Plan mode is dead
> My experience with that is not very good. It gets so hung up in its initial decision. Like, it won't make changes because they're "breaking", for something never even committed.

This hasn't been my experience.

> Or it will litter the code base with defensive code and comments about the path not chosen.

I've definitely seen this, though.

loeg··on Plan mode is dead
That sounds like a contorted way of saying "better."
loeg··on Plan mode is dead
The older models were less good at inferring intent. The new ones just seem to do a better job.
loeg··on Plan mode is dead
> How does it otherwise work if I am not even quite sure what exactly I want to build myself?

It makes some plausible choices and you can retroactively ask it to make different ones later, if you want.

loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
> They are still trying to prosecute him.

Bro, Jeanine Pirro filed to dismiss this (ridiculous) case against Hearn in July. It's over; they are not still trying to prosecute him.

loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
They can try. And just as in myriad other attempts at overreach, they will fail in the courts (on obvious 1A grounds, as others have already pointed out).
loeg··on Writing Rust code that's fast by asking agents to make the code faster
Ok. I think the goalposts have shifted from your original remarks.
loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
Estrada was convicted of tampering with evidence, which is what he did for his wife's little terrorist cell after they were arrested. The elements of the crime aren't in dispute. "Transporting zines" isn't an accurate summary of that and The Intercept's "reporting" on this is just completely slanted slop.

If you know the government will be interested in documents in your possession in relation to a criminal investigation, it is in fact a crime to destroy or remove them. Regardless of content. As to the sentence term -- this is up to the judge.

And it's all completely unrelated to the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which was the topic of this fine article.

loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
No, this is something the article attempts to claim, but it is not true.
loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
Do you think lying about an unrelated case furthers your argument?
loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
> There can be foreign agents criticizing AI, but not all people criticizing AI are foreign agents.

Right. The DoJ is demanding the former group register as foreign agents, as they are required to under FARA.

loeg··on Feds Target AI Critics as "Foreign Agents"
> the Justice Department instructed “citizens and noncitizens” that anyone furthering the “goals” of a foreign power in “any public activity” — including even “public demonstrations” — must formally notify the government to avoid arrest and prosecution.

Citizens acting as foreign agents have always had to register that representation! This is not new to the Trump admin. FARA dates to 1938.

loeg··on Writing Rust code that's fast by asking agents to make the code faster
Crucially, it is easy to avoid making things worse, which was the entire thrust of my earlier comment and the part you've ignored in your response.
loeg··on GPT-6 Sol and Luna
And the bicycles have weird dimensions -- extremely slack head tube angle, handlebars in the wrong orientation, etc.
loeg··on Seattle Bans Rental Junk Fees
No. Seattle caps security deposits.
loeg··on Writing Rust code that's fast by asking agents to make the code faster
> They can also spin round and round making the numbers worse

"Claude, if this idea doesn't measure as an improvement (use X benchmark and a T-test), discard it and try the next idea."

loeg··on Writing Rust code that's fast by asking agents to make the code faster
> but [LLMs] won't come up with [ideas] on their own.

They can, in fact, generate plausible performance optimization ideas on their own.

loeg··on Seattle Bans Rental Junk Fees
A $500 deposit isn't covering 4-5 figures of damage.
loeg··on Writing Rust code that's fast by asking agents to make the code faster
They're quite good at just iterating different "ideas" on a performance metric with an objective measure. They can use tools like `perf` and do some analysis on the output. Sometimes they go off in the weeds unproductively, and sometimes they give up because your goal was too high, but as long as you're sort of babysitting the process, you can make pretty rapid improvement to naive code.
loeg··on Suspension of the de minimis administrative exemption for imports $800 or less
Ok but losing 50-75% of 2024 Trump voters would in fact cede control of more or less every democratically elected position.
loeg··on Suspension of the de minimis administrative exemption for imports $800 or less
The right doesn't like, control the executive by democratic vote. Trump single-handedly does.
loeg··on Suspension of the de minimis administrative exemption for imports $800 or less
He doesn't actually "get away" with it. A lot of people, left and right, are unhappy about tariffs. But for now, he controls the executive, so it is what it is.
loeg··on Suspension of the de minimis administrative exemption for imports $800 or less
Wasn't that already suspended in, like, 2025?
← PreviousPage 7 of 34Next →