137 karma · joined April 13, 2014
IMHO If you are a small startup and can be self disciplined, you don't need Jira. It is more for enterprise setup where accountability/responsibility has to be generally enforced.
Let's say the candidate behaved in this way, should the company ignore it?
Totally agree with you!
In the article you shared, there are mentions of celebrated economists siding with both camps. I will leave up to the chosen government to weigh in those opinions and make a move.
Coming to GST - the earlier tax system was much more complex and leaky. If your turnover is below 75 Lakhs (small traders) you can opt for composition scheme which is even simpler. If your turnover is higher, it should be fair to assume your business is big enough to have a computer operator who can file 3 returns (excel sheet I guess) every month with benefits of input credit.
It works really well for UGC as an ondemand optimizer but you can easily make some URL calls to include it in the build time as well.
May be he had something to do with these initiatives and lead to him being promoted eventually.
All 3 insecure implementations which paper talks about are known from long. Developers concerned about security are cautious about such pitfalls.
I specifically remember trying out KitKat out of craving and it was way sweeter than what I get in India. Tried switching stores before concluding the recipes are tweaked.
"Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited" is a new a telecom operator. Reliance Industries Limited, the parent company, doesn't own any other telecom operator.
It would even backup my SMSes and let me search through them in an online interface. But then MS decided to shut it down within few months of me buying a phone because of this particular feature.
Well, MS does it often.
* You need to fix a price which would cover the cost of your research that went in (and also for unsuccessful researches that you write off for other ailments) * You have idea about the scale of the ailment but little idea about market acceptance and reaction to your price. * After market has accepted a price, even if it exceeds your predicted consumption by many fold, you have little incentive to change the price especially if insurance is paying for it. * In a new market, because you have already recovered what went in to build the medicine, you can price it better.
In fact, insurance itself work very differently in US vs India. In India, in most cases your insurance won't pay for your medicines and medical expenses (diagnostics) if you don't end up hospitalized for at least a day. And that can govern how medicines are priced here because price has a direct implication on adoption.
It has better support as compared to flexgrid.
Does anybody know why it isn't the more common as compared to other solutions?
That is how you can make it faster even when somebody is logged in and you are delivering a somewhat personalized experience.
In fact, it can simulate the scenario better as compared to Chrome as the speed is shared by everything on the system and not just that Chrome tab.
1. Use Chrome's device emulator mode. You can ignore all other settings like screen size, user agent, etc. and just use the speed restriction. 2. Use a specialized WiFi router. I use the ones from TP-Link in which I can restrict speed for a particular device IP. DD WRT based routers can also help here.
If its a virtual meeting (eg. over Skype) with participants from multiple time zones, it is safe to assume always one time zone will take precedence over others and time should be saved with respect to that.
If its a natural event like a solar eclipse, it can be saved in UTC.
There is always one time zone in which the event won't be adjusted. Just use that.
This is not to claim Slack is pricing it utterly wrong. Of course they have their target audience and should do things best for their business.
You will definitely find folks for whom the $100/mo/user is not a big deal and Slack does have that plan with needed features. However if I am bootstrapping with a business with majority of non tech part time employees, its not a quick decision to commit to $8/mo/user.
For comparison, Google Apps provide their complete suite at $5/mo/user. Desk.com provides interfacing with customer starting at $3/mo/agent. With the value they provide I don't think twice before committing to it.
(btw, I could only see their cheapest plan at $8/mo/user paid monthly, where is $5/mo coming from?)