116 karma · joined July 21, 2021
I have a prototype FUSE filesystem which renders the journal as a tree of .log files (https://github.com/awfulcooking/journalfs)
But my muscles finally learned `journalctl` and after reading the docs I mainly use it.
Patches welcome to make journalfs practical (i think it may be lagging output when you `tail -f` atm)
Would love to see systemd offer a virtual filesystem interface by default.
Having one interface to them is useful.
i respect the BSD hacker style, minimal init ethos.
But man is it handy to have declarative sandboxing in service files.
`loginctl` as a standard for listing, locking, killing user sessions.
`machinectl` as a container / virtual machine manager.
And --host / --machine to remote all of the above.
Their mind probably wasn't changed, but having civil discourse about intolerance is important.
I'd much rather see a racist post with thoughtful dissent (which the OP can then read, and is pretty much guaranteed on HN) than for racists to just get excluded, and have no cause to change their mind.
They then go to a more extreme forum, with people who only agree with them. The hate gets amplified instead of dissuaded.
Have you felt strong attraction for both sexes? If not, have you tried to?
I think you're right that Comet refers more to the JavaScript techniques that came from those "forever frames".. but to me it was all about the streaming HTTP hack at the heart of it.
I guess it's academic now :-)
Regarding holy grail layout and IE6.. so you're telling me you're a masochist!
I think the wiki page is wrong that it involved chunked encoding
CGI:IRC used an early frame approach, no JS required.
At some point JSONP became popular, even for 3rd party APIs.
<script src="http://dont-xss-me/please?format=jsonp&callback=lol">
Server writes: lol({ ... })
lol({ ... })Orientation is not a choice, and is orthogonal to identification.
I believe that same-sex relationships can be as profoundly fulfilling, enriching, and pro-social as heterosexual relationships.
That marrying a straight woman with a gay man is profoundly unfulfilling for both.
And that denying a class of people something so profound, freely enjoyed by everyone else, and which does not harm anyone else, can indeed be seen as inhumane.
You can accept that or not, but it's disingenuous to equate asking gays never to have sexual or romantic relationships, to asking non-gay people just to curb excess.
That's not an equal imposition, it feels like self-equivocating ad-hominem to read "you're not being targeted here, so can you stop with the victim complex please?"
If you agree that it's better for gay people to never experience intimacy, please just say so, without labelling the concern (that gay people may feel less invited) as ridiculous
$ redis-cli INCR hit-count
Derek was languishing:
"Lots of situations where I can't really get around the modal..."
I guess the page doesn't necessarily say how a modal might be avoided, but the anchor with this title seemed strong enough as a "QED" on its own.
E pur si existit.