looofooo0

same for Germany which has roughly the same Co2 per kwh.

Yes, also have a look at build123d which has a vscode plugin.

Jenvons Paradox considered?

No

EROI of 5 means 20% all energy goes just to preserving current status. As wind is limited this gives hard limits to what is sustainable in northern countries. These problems completely disappear with nuclear.

Not if you factor in all the residual. Adding to fossil or water based grid is okay, running on its own with all the necessary residual it gets way worse.

Yes but with RE it is the major cost, because they are not firm energy.

Huh? Cost vs EROI differences show potential for improvements. You can never cheat bad eroi of RE grid.

Sure but all the residual stuff needs als be considered.

Sure labor amount is strongly correlated with EROI

That is not how RE works at scale.

Yes, thank you. Eroi ist the only thing which matters from a hard physics stand point.

This is wrong, Germanies Konvoi where immensely profitable. The greens complained about these as money printing machines.

Treat power plants as public infrastructure. No need for high returns or insurance of every risk.

Wrong uranium you can easily stock for 10years inadvance

But we have pretty good understanding of the logical foundations and the truth of computer generated math. So having a big library which humans could never produce or fully understand has still a value on its own. It is just another level of abstraction.

I don't known, can't we just also indirectly observe the wide platonic landscape of mathematics through observing AI results which humanity could not produce in a 1,000,000 years.

Soon AI mathematics will be 10x or 100x or 1000x more productive than humans in the proofing theorems business. Mathematics of old style is dead, they should develop ideas how to deal with that as a math community.

Given what a know about the 2008 financial crisis, wouldn't an AI analysis in the years before that crisis of the real state funds helped to understand the risk of them better and avoid the big exposure.

if people use it to make money, does this not mean that they providing some sort of service which is valued and hence it improves lifes?!

Proofing open math conjectures

What about recent models providing correct proofs to open math problems?

I matters for scientific rigor just because the kid was missing does not mean he drowned.

There is not enough wind capacity in most countries

Problem is that he could have drowned at 16:43.

Yes but ultimatively it could been 16:43 to 18:57 which is 134 Minutes.

I am sceptical about the 147 minutes, the child could have still clinging onto the ice and just drowned a minute before the parents reached the pond.

Well problem is that humans are so noisy through lifestyle, enviroment and genes that any proof for either is really hard.

LNT does also damage, as people refusing necessary CT scans or countries switching of nuclear power because of fear.