Now, what is the point of those bans? So people feel safer while not being safer?
1,244 karma · joined June 13, 2016
Now, what is the point of those bans? So people feel safer while not being safer?
It does not take much to bring down electricity distribution.
I had no problems going 190-210 on a motorcycle. It's just like boat hull speed, after some limit no matter what you do it just won't go faster.
you just don't get a car like that today.
(and you can see it on them in bright sunshine, perfect black cats are not, they exhibit both stripes and reddishness)
Result: not recommended for general use.
Now, given the general ignorance on infosec I'm suprised that people actually refused to pay to upload their passwords. The world has some hope after all.
this is so much bullshit I don't even.
even if they thought that could actually work : it could not unless by "great engineers" you mean "resume-pad masters".
Since there can not be any trust in the supply chain and operations, the only way is to ban ALPR outright.
My position is that it is not possible.
zero CVE policy = halt on business development.
then there was Iiyama Vision Master Pro 514 with 140-ish kHz horisontal scan
lol moment was when we with a girlfriend playfully fell down on sofa, but the then master-of-house siberian 6kg cat considered that a threat to me.
he jumped ~3m claws open, smashed a desk top lamp, shredded the gfs' top and basically opened up her back before I could stop him.
do not underestimate cats.
This is what middle ages were famous for, and it took Renaissance to get rid of this.
edit: Giordano Bruno was burned at stake for challengin people like you.
but ye, who I am to persecute people based on their beliefs, this is for religious people to do.
The rest of your comment is even worse. Cults? Consider AGW cult where people reject any attempt of a discourse because "science is settled". Which is equivalent to "God told us this".