luckydata

someone already does that https://aistupidlevel.info/

without knowing the prompts and the test setup this exercise is essentially devoid of any value. I need to get into blogging more, there's no barrier to entry!

I think this is another VR moment for Meta. It wasn't necessarily a terrible idea to invest in VR - I mean it was but let's suspend disbelief for a moment - but Meta is not the company that would succeed in that market. Meta is not a hardware company, not really, and is not an "experiences" company. VR would have had to rely on a lot of premium content, and either you have a company like Disney controlling their own ecosystem or who do you think Disney is going to work with, Meta or Apple?

I tried to explain to my Meta colleagues with the virtual reality push was absolutely doomed to fail no matter how good the hardware was and this is the same. Nobody is going to look at Meta for a personal assistant, the world has caught on and besides nobody things about Facebook as the place that is useful, that's Google.

I'm Italian, I thought using the full word instead of eliding the last "e" was an archaic florentine habit that the author used, didn't think much of it tbh.

is this a real paper? read like some kind of parody.

both repositories for pre-training and post-training are actually empty... someone might have jumped the gun on the release.

who gives a shit tbh, argue with the substance, not the style.

This is an enormously wide question but the quickest way to give you an idea would be rephrasing as:

"Are cars not a solved problem? Why are there lots of different cars? Why is one faster than the other? What's different between them?"

I think the best way to approach the subject in an easy to grasp way is to ask Gemini or another frontier AI to teach you the basics, they will do a surprisingly good job and they'll be able to react to your questions with INFINITE patience.

Signoz

Someone should build a capable technical writing model, would make a TON of money

Me for example.

when I worked at google I was known to be a very effective "legal whisperer". I spent more time in legal reviews in the last decade than you'll ever spend in the entirety of your life as I was working on infrastructure dealing with tons of PII working across the globe. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about here.

every single word. this is a project to enable private AI use cases which is a very real concern for a lot of enterprise customers dealing with highly sensitive data (think about healthcare and police work for example) and has nothing to do in any way shape or form with ads. The guy probably used to work or still works at Google but doesn't mean he understands what he's talking about.

is that why everything Claude writes lately sounds like a riddle?

the product information could be put in a skill, I don't see the value of polluting the system prompt with that much info about claude the product. Anthropic you're welcome.

I'm really put off by the poor quality of the 3d printed body

you are 100% correct, this product is to enable things like healthcare and generally AI subscription stuff that otherwise people wouldn't touch because of sensitivity to disclosing sensitive data.

and you don't know who I am. I might have been closer to that work than you would know.

Reading Opus AND Fable's output gives me a headache.

you can produce a correct result without knowing what that result means as long as the person you then provide that result to can decrypt it. So the way it works is the server does the job on data it can't read, sends an answer to the device, the device decrypts it.

It's very useful for things like healthcare data for example but also for products like "home assistants", and it's one of the use cases that the team hiring internally was giving in their job req. I tried to apply too but didn't get it unfortunately, this was a very interesting product to work on imho, congrats to whoever got my job :)

You are very wrong about all of this btw.

an agent could run a finite element analysis or some kind of generative design algorithm, it's not new stuff all of it is already available in Fusion by Autodesk.

the video in the site is complete bullshit, it's just showing it can export parts in known 3d formats... so what? Show me what the AI is capable to do in an iteration. This seems like mostly vaporware and nothing concrete.

a truism but also not that interesting. why is this getting upvoted?

when it comes to security popularity doesn't matter all that much. If something is not used and insecure then the decision should be to drop the feature, not to ignore the security issue.

I would like to see your "home"

There's so many but I'll give you an easy one: usury is legal in the US.

Another easy one: the US has legalized political bribery to a degree that would (and has) landed many European politicians in prison for years.

you don't need to be an introvert to find that line of reasoning short sighted. I'm plenty extroverted and I still don't want to deal with people coming to my house to clean it. It's very invasive and they rarely do a good job. A robot that I can "train" to do exactly what I need and constantly works in the background would be a HUGE value add to my lifestyle.

it's not cheap at all and the privacy and logistical implications of letting a stranger inside your house is something not everyone wants to deal with. I would rather have a robot.

if you give me a robot that cleans the house and can do dishes and laundry I'll easily pay the cost of a compact car for that. I know a LOT of working families that would feel similarly.