Small bug report: on mobile layout, the like/dislike button is getting a bit clipped and the watch later button seems a bit off too.
521 karma · joined September 18, 2014
Small bug report: on mobile layout, the like/dislike button is getting a bit clipped and the watch later button seems a bit off too.
..but you can!
Nothing controversial here.
My 2021 car has sort of similar scrolling wheel to control the infotainment (which has no touch) and it's nowhere near this level of polish.
I gave it a shot now:
mlx_vlm.generate --model mlx-community/Qwen3.8-27B-4bit --prompt 'give me fizz buzz in rust' --enable-thinking --draft-kind mtp --draft-model mlx-community/Qwen3.8-27B-MTP-4bit --verbose
==========
Prompt: 58 tokens, 90.717 tokens-per-sec Generation: 145 tokens, 36.392 tokens-per-sec Peak memory: 17.419 GB Speculative decoding: 2.79 accepted tokens/round (1.79 accepted drafts/round, 89.4% of drafted, avg draft 2.00) over 52 rounds
Which is very close to ollama, thank you!
I'm not sure if I can get rid of the drafter model, if I understand correctly, the Qwen model already includes a built in draft headers, but just having --draft-kind mtp results in about 17 t/s.
So far ollama managed to be the most performant of them all. I will get 30 to 40 tokes/sec with it when using the -mlx version of Qwen3.8.
Whatever the sauce the ollama folks baked into the mlx + MTP mix is currently working the best out of the box.
So what do you do? You engage and some 3rd party 1800-need-soc2 clowns which will hold your hand and implement all the cookie cutter solutions they know will make auditor happy (oh and btw, they know the auditor personally).
In a 20 people startup it's very likely that most engineers have access to production anyway and can inject malicious stuff directly, so PRs stop no one really.
- HN User created 66 days ago
- In these 66 days it submitted 4 stories about this project
- The heavy lifting is all done by v86 project (not jslinux as initially suspected)
- The project is a "rebrand/fork" from another project by the same author - "traits.build".
- In the original project, the first commits that mention v86 seem to start at around 23rd of April.
To be clear, I don't really mind people vibing & slopping around. I just would want to have a disclosure about it.
You can use the drug to loose weight while trying to understand the underlying problem.
I hope that with LLMs, answering security questionnaires will be much less time consuming for companies and less would opt out to get a full blown SOC2 cert. But it will probably play the other way.
Ok, wait, why?